<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>
Dr. Sneath speaks with
Ian Ellison-Taylor and
Kevin Gjerstad about new improvements and features in WPF 3.5 Service Pack 1.&amp;nbsp;
Topics of the conversation range from 
Graphics, Deployment, 
Performance, Application Model and
Tools.&amp;nbsp; And while discussing the current state and the future of WPF a few applications are mentioned including&amp;nbsp;Lawson
 &amp;quot;Mango&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;and Yahoo Messenger. 
Not only does this video provide you with a great overview of WPF 3.5 SP1, but it is kicking off
WPF Week on Channel 9.&amp;nbsp; 
Each day this week we’ll be publishing a video focused on one area of WPF to give you a detailed look at what’s new.


 
&amp;nbsp; 
SP1 Download links: 

Visual Studio 2008 Service Pack 1 (Beta)
.NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (Beta)
Visual Studio 2008 Express Editions SP1 (Beta)
Visual Studio 2008 Team Foundation Server 2008 SP1 (Beta)


 
</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:07:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[When did WPF get to 3.5? I thought it was 1.0.<p>posted by DigitalDud</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462121860000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:03:06 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462121860000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">DigitalDud wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;When did WPF get to 3.5? I thought it was 1.0.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Jumped right into it.<p>posted by littleguru</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462144460000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462144460000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>littleguru</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ah, good point - we should be clearer about what we're talking about here.&nbsp; v1 of WPF shipped first as part of .Net 3.0 (and included in Vista), our next version was in .Net 3.5 and what we're talking about here is our 3rd release as part of .Net 3.5 SP1.
<br>
<br>
Sorry for the confusion,<br>
<br>
Ian.<br>
<p>posted by Ian Ellison-Taylor</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462159100000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462159100000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ellison-Taylor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The 3.5 refers to the .net version.&nbsp; The problem I saw with the additions of WPF that shipped with .net 3.5 has to do with the documentation.&nbsp; The documentation of the WPF base release is generally pretty good.&nbsp; The documentation for the first set of additions
 is skimpy at best and not integrated with the base documentation.&nbsp; You need to a better job with the documentation of future additions.<p>posted by dnjake</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462161290000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462161290000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>dnjake</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[After reading Scott Guthrie's (excellent as usual) <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/05/12/visual-studio-2008-and-net-framework-3-5-service-pack-1-beta.aspx">
description of all the updates in VS 2008 &amp; .NET Framework 3.5 SP1</a>, it seems as if WPF gets more updates from 3.5 RTM to 3.5 SP1 as it has from 3.0 RTM to 3.5 RTM.
<br>
<br>
So the versioning might seem a little bit odd, but of course WPF is part of the larger .NET Framework and thus doesn't have it's own version numbers.<p>posted by mawcc</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462226360000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462226360000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mawcc</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[SOunds almost like .Net 3.6 and VS 2008 &#43; .5<br>
<br>
lot's of good stuff in them bits... <br>
<br>
now just gotta wait for them to bake and cool off to use them <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<br>
I have an app on 60 desktops that I want to move from .net 2.0 to 3.5 soon... must find out if the boot strap will work for a low-trust user account ??<br>
<br>
<p>posted by figuerres</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462258080000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:50:08 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462258080000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Ian Ellison-Taylor wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Ah, good point - we should be clearer about what we're talking about here.&nbsp; v1 of WPF shipped first as part of .Net 3.0 (and included in Vista), our next version was in .Net 3.5 and what we're talking about here is our 3rd release as
 part of .Net 3.5 SP1. <br>
<br>
Sorry for the confusion,<br>
<br>
Ian.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I just posted and if not covered in the video:<br>
<br>
Can a non-admin user who does not have full access but has a .net 2.0 app today get an update that will boot-strap to .net 3.5 and then get the app w/o an admin logon??<br>
<br>
it's a click once app on about 60 pc's that are in remote locations.<br>
<br>
if an admin login is required then it will take days to update them.<br>
<br>
so to recap:<br>
<br>
can I boot-strap from a click once &nbsp;app with net 2.0 to a new version of the app with .net 3.5 with a limited user account?<br>
<p>posted by figuerres</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462261070000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:55:07 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462261070000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">mawcc wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;After reading Scott Guthrie's (excellent as usual) <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/05/12/visual-studio-2008-and-net-framework-3-5-service-pack-1-beta.aspx">
description of all the updates in VS 2008 &amp; .NET Framework 3.5 SP1</a>, it seems as if WPF gets more updates from 3.5 RTM to 3.5 SP1 as it has from 3.0 RTM to 3.5 RTM.
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Looks like DBPro's not getting any love <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-6.gif' alt='Sad' /><p>posted by PerfectPhase</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462296150000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462296150000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>PerfectPhase</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Why would you add new features in a service pack to the framework? Why not just release a feature pack now, then bake those features into the next point release of the framework?<br>
<br>
By adding new features in a service pack, you'll generate potential confusion. I'll say my app requires .NET 3.5, but then I'm using some SP1 features, then my client installs the app and it doesn't work because they don't have SP1 installed.<br>
<br>
I can understand improving performace in a service pack, but why add new features to&nbsp;a service pack? Why not release them in a feature pack, like how the ASP.NET team did with the ASP.NET AJAX Extensions v1.0?<p>posted by CRPietschmann</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462330490000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:50:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462330490000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>CRPietschmann</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The big issues was that we wanted to make some core performance improvements so we couldn't do just a pure feature pack. We could have separated the fixes from the features but got feedback from ISVs early on that it was better to just put them together
 in to a single release. <br>
<br>
I do appreciate the confusion though so this is definitely something we'll re-think for future versions. Do other folks agree we should keep things separate in the future?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Ian.<p>posted by Ian Ellison-Taylor</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462495560000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462495560000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ellison-Taylor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">figuerres wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279; <br>
<br>
Can a non-admin user who does not have full access but has a .net 2.0 app today get an update that will boot-strap to .net 3.5 and then get the app w/o an admin logon??<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Unfortunately not. This update at least makes some core changes and so requires admin privs. We definitely get this request *a lot* though and it is something we're moving towards (it's just really hard to engineer).<br>
<br>
Sorry, <br>
<br>
Ian.<p>posted by Ian Ellison-Taylor</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462498290000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462498290000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ellison-Taylor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ribbon control in WPF! YES!!! Finally!!! <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-2.gif' alt='Big Smile' /><p>posted by Klaus Enevoldsen</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462723380000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462723380000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Klaus Enevoldsen</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Klaus Enevoldsen wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Ribbon control in WPF! YES!!! Finally!!! <img src="/emoticons/emotion-2.gif" border="0"></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The only criticism I have, is when the controls are released. Tim uses the euphemism &quot;out-of-band&quot; in his blog, but also states that Line Of Business applications are taking up WPF rapaciously.<br>
<br>
Why the silverlight beta included the datagrid, but this does not is a mystery? I need to get compos-mentes with this control (and the ribbon) for my smart client applications, but am having to wait.<br>
<br>
One cannot diminish the <i>phenomenal </i>improvements to a <i>plethora </i>of issues that have kept me in windows forms for LOB applications. If you try the piteous WPF controls from e.g.
<a href="http://www.componentone.com/">http://www.componentone.com/</a> staying with windows forms becomes the easiest of decisions. Forget about a dog running with three legs, more a dog with half a leg. For now it will be another 3 to 6 months till some of
 the essential controls become available. What a shame!<br>
<p>posted by vesuvius</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462750790000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633462750790000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>vesuvius</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Ian Ellison-Taylor wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>figuerres wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279; <br>
<br>
Can a non-admin user who does not have full access but has a .net 2.0 app today get an update that will boot-strap to .net 3.5 and then get the app w/o an admin logon??<br>
<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Unfortunately not. This update at least makes some core changes and so requires admin privs. We definitely get this request *a lot* though and it is something we're moving towards (it's just really hard to engineer).<br>
<br>
Sorry, <br>
<br>
Ian.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I understand the issues,<br>
<br>
Please If we can get more info on what it can/can't do etc...<br>
<br>
for example can we setup a &quot;reboot&quot; / &quot;runOnce&quot; to do that perhaps?<br>
<br>
<p>posted by figuerres</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463001200000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463001200000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Can't load the file. I don't get the Download/WMA/MP3 options on the page.<p>posted by ShilpaT</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463023390000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:05:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463023390000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>ShilpaT</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[is it safe to install VS 2008 SP1 Beta on a development machine? I mean we all know Visual Studio is a very heavy piece of software, I don't want to remove the whole thing just to remove SP1 <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<p>posted by Ion Todirel</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463060060000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463060060000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ion Todirel</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>sweeet <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>i have one question though, where exactly do you post feedback? the msdn forums are vast and im always feeling im posting in the wrong place <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> is there a prefered place there? or is connect the way to go? i havent found a connect project for .net or wpf&nbsp;as
 a whole (if there is one please link <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> )</p>
<p>posted by aL_</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463079090000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:38:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463079090000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>aL_</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Uhm, problem :<br>
<br>
<b>Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 SP1 (Beta) does not apply, or is blocked by another condition on your system. Please click the link below for more details.</b><br>
<br>
So i can't click NEXT <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-6.gif' alt='Sad' /><br>
<br>
UPDATE:<br>
<br>
Fixed it, had to uninstall Silverlight Tools Beta 1 (got to love those bèta's) and uninstall KB949325<p>posted by CKurt</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463113810000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463113810000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>CKurt</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">figuerres wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;<br>
I understand the issues,<br>
<br>
Please If we can get more info on what it can/can't do etc...<br>
<br>
for example can we setup a &quot;reboot&quot; / &quot;runOnce&quot; to do that perhaps?<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I'm not entirely sure, let me check and get back to you. Around here we do distribute admin-level software using SMS to machines that are locked-down&nbsp;so I know it's possible but I don't know how it works!<br>
<br>
Ian.<p>posted by Ian Ellison-Taylor</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463205830000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463205830000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ellison-Taylor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Ion Todirel wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;is it safe to install VS 2008 SP1 Beta on a development machine? I mean we all know Visual Studio is a very heavy piece of software, I don't want to remove the whole thing just to remove SP1
<img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I'd be a little carefull with any beta software and I know some folks have had issues uninstalling. For me, it's worked just fine so it might for you too but I always recommend a VPC, or a complete backup just in case!<br>
<br>
Ian.<p>posted by Ian Ellison-Taylor</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463208800000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463208800000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ellison-Taylor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">aL_ wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<p>i have one question though, where exactly do you post feedback? the msdn forums are vast and im always feeling im posting in the wrong place
<img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"> is there a prefered place there? or is connect the way to go? i havent found a connect project for .net or wpf&nbsp;as a whole (if there is one please link
<img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"> )</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
General feedback here is just fine. For more specific feedback on VS you can use <a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=2136&amp;SiteID=1">
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=2136&amp;SiteID=1</a>&nbsp;or for WPF specifically&nbsp;just use the regular WPF forum
<a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=119&amp;SiteID=1">http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=119&amp;SiteID=1</a>&nbsp;and maybe put &quot;SP1&quot; somewhere in the title.
<br>
<br>
For connect, we come under the general &quot;Visual Studio and .Net Framework&quot; at <a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio">
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Ian.<p>posted by Ian Ellison-Taylor</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463217860000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633463217860000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ellison-Taylor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>I would suggest a better describing name.</p>
<p>Why don't you call a ServicePack 'SP&lt;number&gt;' (SP1) and a feature pack 'FP&lt;number&gt;' (FP1) and when combined 'UP&lt;number&gt;' (UP1) where UP stands for update pack.[A]<br>
<br>
We use this system for a while now and it's (for us...) quite clear.<br>
<br>
Regards Johan Visser</p>
<p>posted by JohaViss</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633471410310000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633471410310000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>JohaViss</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>I can understand improving performace in a service pack, but why add new features to&nbsp;a service pack? Why
<a href="http://www.koxpturkey.com">koxp</a> not release them in a feature pack, like how the ASP.NET team did with the ASP.NET AJAX Extensions v1.0?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yeah ?? <a href="http://www.tolga.gen.tr">tolga </a>???</p>
<p>posted by Koxp</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633827182820000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c633827182820000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Koxp</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Ian Ellison-Taylor and Kevin Gjerstad on WPF 3.5 SP1</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I can understand improving performace in a service pack<br />&nbsp;<br />&lt;a href="http://www.cafepolis.net"&gt;polis&lt;/a&gt;<p>posted by polis</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c634251862210000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:17:01 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/AdamKinney/Ian-Ellison-Taylor-and-Kevin-Gjerstad-on-WPF-35-SP1#c634251862210000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>polis</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>