Michael Fruergaard Pontoppidan – Model driven development in Dynamics AX
- Posted: Sep 15, 2006 at 5:42 PM
- 39,595 Views
- 10 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Nice video. Finally we see some Dynamics videos on Chanel 9. When will they release other Dynamics product videos?
MS is moving the 5 Dynamics platforms to one product, and I've heard that it is going to based on Dynamics AX. Each one of these products have their own language. x++,C/Side,Dexterity, and I don't know what solomon is using VB? How are they going to move them C#?
As you said there are 5 mil lines of business logic in AX and, I'm sure the other products have the same number of code, Also each of these ERP have their own table structures. There probably more than 1000 tables in each of these products. Each of these products have their own Virtical solutions with hundreds of new tables and 1000's of line of code.
Also all of these ERP systems are targeted toward middle market. Ax is targeted toward middle to upper Market. Could Ax compete agains SAP? I'm sure it's happening everyday, but will it be capable to be used by MS themselves?
Based on MS the final Product is 3 years away. And during that time they'll make the UI look the same, so customers wouldn't notice the difference, but developers and solution centers, will pay the price. I hope MS is thinking of them.
Axapta, aka DynAX, is... crap. Honest IMHO.
Why? Too complicated, incredibly poorly documented, buggy and unfinished, too hungry for resources, expencive in sale and implementation. Hellish software. But not worst software ever (we still have SAP and "Oracle PeopleSoft JDE").
PS: I'm Navision aka Dynamics NAV addict!
MS thinking about sales and ricing prices only.
"will pay the price".... Oh, yes indeed, we are paying...
Perhaps they should make AX available as a developer tool with the option to buy the MS ERP modules separately.
Right now AX is still too expensive for many companies that could make excellent use of such a system. In a lot of cases, the ERP is overkill, but being able to develop something from scratch in such a well suited environment could be awesome.
gordon
The link to the video file is broken.
Please restore one.
Thank you in advance,
Igor.
It's a pity MS won't provide IntelliMorph like technology in Visulal Studio.
A short description:
http://safari.ciscopress.com/9780735622579/ch11lev1sec2
Igor.
From here I recommend viewing some of these publifications:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/mfp/
Thanks!
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close