<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Mike Swanson has done it again!&amp;nbsp; Check out his (http://www.mikeswanson.com/swf2xaml) SWF to XAML converter.&amp;nbsp; Wow!
In this segment, he demos the tool in action and explains the secrets of how he pulled it off. Karsten Januszewski conducts the interview.</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:10:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Dudes,<br /><br />Looks really cool!<br /><br />The link doesn't work on the article though, sends me to MS IT OWA.</p>
<p>posted by tenorwoody85</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997234290000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997234290000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>tenorwoody85</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Link fixed... <a href="http://www.mikeswanson.com/swf2xaml" target="_blank">
http://www.mikeswanson.com/swf2xaml</a><p>posted by Charles</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997243940000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997243940000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Begun the vector wars has ! <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-5.gif' alt='Wink' /><br /><p>posted by OmegaSupreme</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997370740000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997370740000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>OmegaSupreme</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It's as if a thousand Adobe developers scream in terror and are then suddenly silenced.<p>posted by macbirdie</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997456210000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997456210000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>macbirdie</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This looks interesting <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br /><br /><blockquote>
<div>macbirdie wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;It's as if a thousand Adobe developers scream in terror and are then suddenly silenced.</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Until it supports ActionScript I don't think anyone is *too* worried.&nbsp; Of course a XAML-SWF converter would be spectacular and allow Microsoft to take advantage of the huge installation base of Flash.<br /><br />I'd always thought the SWF spec proprietary though, I'm surprised it is as open as it appears to be.<br /><br /><br />Edit: Having thought a little more about it, isn't there a Javascript implementation for the CLR? ActionScript is essentially the same (EcmaScript) - although I guess it would involve reworking all of the existing Flash AS apis.<br /><p>posted by Rossj</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997884020000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:33:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997884020000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Rossj</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Rossj wrote:</div>
<div>This looks interesting <img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"><br />isn't there a Javascript implementation for the CLR? <br /></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Dude, do you forget JScript.NET?<br /><br />Sheva<br /><p>posted by footballism</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997924660000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632997924660000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>footballism</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Rossj wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;I'd always thought the SWF spec proprietary though, I'm surprised it is as open as it appears to be.</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />For context, Adobe does make the Flash file format specification available: <a href="http://www.adobe.com/licensing/developer/">
http://www.adobe.com/licensing/developer/</a>. Unfortunately, their license was too restrictive for my needs, so I had to use other publicly available information on the internet (and there's a lot of it) to build the SWF2XAML tool. It's also important to note
 that I've built a converter, not a player. My goal is not to play back Flash content.<br /><br />The inspiration for this tool came from many of the early adopters I've been working with over the past couple of years. A lot of them have content in the form of SWF files, and they want to use some of that content in their WPF applications. In many cases,
 they no longer have the original Flash project files (.FLA). So, this tool was built to help solve those needs.<br /><p>posted by mswanson</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632998139760000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632998139760000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mswanson</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>A previous version of the Vista Smalltalk interpreter used a Javascript-like syntax, and I still have the Antlr syntax for it. It should be fairly simple to modify&nbsp;it for ActionScript.<br /><br />The interpreter is designed for (hopefully) running in WPF/e.<br /><br /><a href="https://vistasmalltalk.wordpress.com/">https://vistasmalltalk.wordpress.com/</a><br /><a href="http://vistascript.net/vistascript/docuwiki/doku.php">http://vistascript.net/vistascript/docuwiki/doku.php</a><br /><br />Time to sell your Adobe shares!<br /><br /></p>
<p>posted by pfisk</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632998181790000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632998181790000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>pfisk</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[FYI...I just posted a short <a href="/Showpost.aspx?postid=259879">11½ minute walk-through</a> of the tool.<p>posted by mswanson</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632998244110000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632998244110000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mswanson</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>mswanson wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td><strong>Rossj wrote:</strong> <i>&#65279;I'd always thought the SWF spec proprietary though, I'm surprised it is as open as it appears to be.</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p><br /><br />&nbsp;In many cases, they no longer have the original Flash project files (.FLA). So, this tool was built to help solve those needs.<br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />So now it's easier to pillage someone else’s work? Great... Ahh… gotta love the irony here MS helping people steal copyrighted art work and port it to a useable format.
<p></p>
<p>Just cause they may say they no longer have the fla doesn’t mean they had it to begin with. I can’t believe I’m reading this. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-8.gif' alt='Expressionless' /><br /></p>
<p>posted by Sourcecode</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999149830000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999149830000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Sourcecode</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Sourcecode wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;So now it's easier to pillage someone else’s work? Great... Ahh… gotta love the irony here MS helping people steal copyrighted art work and port it to a useable format.
<p></p>
<p>Just cause they may say they no longer have the fla doesn’t mean they had it to begin with. I can’t believe I’m reading this.
<img src="/emoticons/emotion-8.gif" border="0"><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Believe it, Sourcecode. In a few very large cases that I'm aware of, third-parties were hired to deliver thousands of small Flash animations, but they never thought to obtain the original FLA files. Today, when they're considering an update to WPF, they find
 themselves out of luck. This tool allows them to preserve some of their investment in those assets.<br /><br /><p>posted by mswanson</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999167380000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999167380000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mswanson</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>mswanson wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td><strong>Sourcecode wrote:</strong> <i>&#65279;So now it's easier to pillage someone else’s work? Great... Ahh… gotta love the irony here MS helping people steal copyrighted art work and port it to a useable format.
<p></p>
<p>Just cause they may say they no longer have the fla doesn’t mean they had it to begin with. I can’t believe I’m reading this.
<img src="/emoticons/emotion-8.gif" border="0"><br /></p>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p><br /><br />Believe it, Sourcecode. In a few very large cases that I'm aware of, third-parties were hired to deliver thousands of small Flash animations, but they never thought to obtain the original FLA files. Today, when they're considering an update to WPF, they find
 themselves out of luck. This tool allows them to preserve some of their investment in those assets.<br /><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />I don't want to cause any grief for you but I really need to post something&nbsp;about this in the coffehouse to get other opinions. It’s not as much a tool problem as a double standard thing that really kind of itches me wrong.
<p></p>
<p>Please come and join the discussion there.</p>
<p>posted by Sourcecode</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999189530000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999189530000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Sourcecode</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[For those who want to follow the discussion with Sourcecode, here's a <a href="/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=260295">
link to the Coffeehouse thread</a>.<p>posted by mswanson</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999258330000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:43:53 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c632999258330000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mswanson</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>I'll take the words of &quot;OmegaSupreme&quot; and &quot;macbirdie&quot; and say</p>
<p>Begun the vector wars has and a thousand Adobe developers scream in real terror and are then suddenly silenced!</p>
<p>Good, no..., Great job Mike!<br /></p>
<p>posted by delcom5</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633001654250000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633001654250000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>delcom5</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>The ability&nbsp;to convert from one format to another is, to me, always&nbsp;a win-win situation.&nbsp; The source software continues to be a viable content development platform (e.g. designers continue to get to work in Adobe product suite) and new software is afforded
 a migration/conversion path from existing technologies (e.g. VS guys can work with existing content).&nbsp;
<br /><br />It's sad to me that vendors don't see these scenarios as opportunities.&nbsp; I mean, wouldn't it be nicer to see the headline &quot;Microsoft and Adobe work together to ensure seamless integration between Flash and Expression design tools&quot;?&nbsp; Wouldn't you be more inclined
 to accept a solution that used either company's technology than to eschew all current formats for a new one?<br /><br />I for one think a tool like this ought not be a tool, but rather an implicit feature in both Expression/Orcas and Flash.&nbsp; Making customers conform to your product line is so, 1999. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /></p>
<p>posted by leadfoot</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633002049690000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 06:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633002049690000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>leadfoot</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I really agree. I think if one looks at the way industries are moving towards open file formats, you'll see this more and more in all kinds of areas.<p>posted by ljuvefreya</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633007551930000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 15:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633007551930000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>ljuvefreya</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Mike Swanson: SWF to WPF Converter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Sourcecode wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;<br /><br />I don't want to cause any grief for you but I really need to post something&nbsp;about this in the coffehouse to get other opinions. It’s not as much a tool problem as a double standard thing that really kind of itches me wrong.
<p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Here's one interesting story:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.advogato.org/article/101.html">http://www.advogato.org/article/101.html</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>posted by mano</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633017397480000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Mike-Swanson-SWF-to-WPF-Converter#c633017397480000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mano</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>