<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Recently, Microsoft and UGS announced a new business partnership and strategic alliance. What does this mean? Well, for one thing, it means that UGS has direct access to the brains behind the products they rely
 on to conduct their business successfully. Of course, this interests Channel 9 (not that the business stuff&amp;nbsp;doesn&#39;t, but we like technology here)In this interview, you will meet David Mitchell, Vice President, Technology Officer, UGS, and SQL Server development lead and query optimization guru, Conor Cunningham. Also present as moderator of the discussion is Abel Cruz, a Program Manager in the ISV division
 (the business guy). We talk about the implications of SQL 2005 on UGS success as well dive into other technical aspects of the UGS/Microsoft alliance.This is a frank and open discussion with an enterprise customer who relies on our platform and technologies to be successful.</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:32:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:32:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Sorry to say, and guy's don’t take this wrong but, this is the closest you have managed to come toward a late night infomercial. I'm honestly interested in SQL Server, and how it’s used, but way to evangelistic for me. I cut if off after 7min’s.</p>
<p>I love all the other videos, and look forward to many more. Just wanted to say what was on my mind.<br /><br />No offence to anyone in the video of course.<img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br /></p>
<p>posted by Sourcecode</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632920146850000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632920146850000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Sourcecode</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Sourcecode,</p>
<p>You should watch deeper into the video. We do get more technical... Any time you have a customer in an interview, there is the chance for infomercialness. That said, it's nice to see how the technologies we create are being used in the real world.
<br /><br />I did get a lead dev involved in the interview! Gotta give it up for that <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-5.gif' alt='Wink' /></p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback! We'll continue to evolve.<br />C</p>
<p>posted by Charles</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632920300460000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632920300460000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Charles wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;
<p>Sourcecode,</p>
<p>You should watch deeper into the video. We do get more technical... Any time you have a customer in an interview, there is the chance for infomercialness. That said, it's nice to see how the technologies we create are being used in the real world.
<br /><br />I did get a lead dev involved in the interview! Gotta give it up for that <img src="/emoticons/emotion-5.gif" border="0"></p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback! We'll continue to evolve.<br />C</p>
<p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />OK, I'm up for seconds, I'll have another look tomorrow.
<p></p>
<p>But if I see a Buy now and you’ll get VS2003 for only 99.99$ extra, operators are standing by !!!</p>
<p>I’ll… we’ll; that would be funny.<br /><br /><img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /></p>
<p>posted by Sourcecode</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632920331920000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632920331920000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Sourcecode</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Charles,<br /><br />Please take some interview training.<br /><br />Stop saying &quot;excellent.&quot;<br /><br />Stop saying &quot;So lets talk about that.&quot;<br /><br />Before you go into an interview do some preperation.<br /><br />Put some questions together do some research and guide the interviewee through the interview. All to often you let the interviewee guide you.<br /><br />I really like channel9 but you just need to be more focused in the interviews.<p>posted by damage-inc</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632922242400000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632922242400000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>damage-inc</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[i 'd disagree with all of your points, please take no offence <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> i think all of the points you mentioned have become trademarks of channel9 - in the spirit of scoble <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br /><p>posted by mwirth</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632922383510000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632922383510000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>mwirth</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Channel 9 interviews are conversations. The focus of the interviews are the interviewees, not me. I like to let them guide the conversation. My approach is ask a question, have a chat about it. The conversation happens from there. It's hard to not provide
 feedback while listening to the answer (I am a participant in the conversation, after all).<br /><br />Good feedback. I'll try to stop saying excellent so much. I see nothing wrong with saying &quot;So let's talk about that&quot;. That seems to me to be a very good discussion starter.<br /><br />I think there is a happy medium of preparation, however. I don't want to be overprepared as then the questions will be loaded and obvious. On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with having some good questions prepared and believe or not sometimes I have
 them...<br /><br />Thanks, as always, for specific fedback on interviewing technique. Certainly, I have no formal training in this area.<br /><br />C<p>posted by Charles</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632922941140000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:48:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632922941140000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've got to agree with SourceCode. This video was <em>dreadful</em>. A blatant press release. Not in the spirit of C9 at all.<p>posted by Orac</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632923199090000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632923199090000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Orac</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Orac wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;I've got to agree with SourceCode. This video was <em>dreadful</em>. A blatant press release. Not in the spirit of C9 at all.</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />It was an announcement, for sure, but the conversation was more than just hype. I understand it's not representative of typical C9 coverage and it does not mean we are changing how we do things.
<br /><br />I guess this was a failed experiment for C9 content, eh? Personally, I was thrilled to see a real world enterprise customer truly excited about our technology and expousing this excitement to one of the developers who wrote a piece of the technology.<br /><br />C<p>posted by Charles</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632923314650000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632923314650000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: UGS, SQL 2005, Office 12 and Windows Server 2003: A marriage made in heaven</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>Charles wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;Channel 9 interviews are conversations. The focus of the interviews are the interviewees, not me. I like to let them guide the conversation. My approach is ask a question, have a chat about it. The conversation happens from there. It's hard to not provide
 feedback while listening to the answer (I am a participant in the conversation, after all).<br /></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Ok. this make more sense when you put it like that. I guess my only comments is that sometimes the interviews...I mean &quot;conversations&quot; <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> tend to drift.
<br /><br /><br /><blockquote>
<div>charles wrote:</div>
<div>I think there is a happy medium of preparation, however. I don't want to be overprepared as then the questions will be loaded and obvious. On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with having some good questions prepared and believe or not sometimes I
 have them...<br /><br />Thanks, as always, for specific fedback on interviewing technique. Certainly, I have no formal training in this area.<br /></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Good point.<p>posted by damage-inc</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632923918070000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/UGS-SQL-2005-Office-12-and-Windows-Server-2003-A-marriage-made-in-heaven#c632923918070000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>damage-inc</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>