<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Reactive Extensions for .NET (Rx)&amp;nbsp;released this week during PDC09. Rx uses Parallel Extensions for .NET (Px) for all of it&#39;s&amp;nbsp;concurrent and parallel
 computing needs. How is it using Px, specifically? What&#39;s going on here and why?&amp;nbsp;Stephen Toub, PM on the Px team, and Wes Dyer, developer on the Rx team, tell us all about this partnership the experience of collaborating on two very compatible technologies that, taken together, create something beautiful. Some many&amp;nbsp;xs, so little time.Enjoy. </description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:47:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>both Rx and Tpl are awsome <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /></p>
<p>but i do feel like there is still a blit of an overlap, &quot;Start&quot; is the most obvious example. will there be even tighter integration in the future do you think?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>is there any perticular reason for using Observable.Start instead of Taks.Factory.StartNew(..).ToObservable?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>posted by aL_</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633942652010000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:06:41 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633942652010000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>aL_</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>20 characters less to type is not a good reason? <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /></p>
<p>posted by exoteric</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633942752890000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633942752890000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>exoteric</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Maybe what we need is something like LINQ Query Expressions but for TPL? What I mean is an embedded DSL within C# and VB.NET for expressing parallel patterns and which the compiler can then transform into explicit dot-heavy TPL method invocations.</p>
<p>posted by tomkirbygreen</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633942929710000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633942929710000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>tomkirbygreen</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>well i guess <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> but there are lots more options in StartNew than in Start, i think the redundacy is a little confusing.. imo its more clear whats going on if only the tasks was used for that</p>
<p>(but thats just my personal taste)</p>
<p>posted by aL_</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633943101170000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:35:17 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633943101170000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>aL_</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>I really would like to know how Microsoft positions the CCR story in comparisson with Rx and PFx!?!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Wasn't CCR all about concurrency and coordination? </p>
<p>That makes one think that PFx and Rx in combination is a political vehicle against the CCR?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I think that there must be more people out there that needs a kind of an explanation about this! So far CCR was just a part of the Robotics Studio; would that mean that in the future RS will use Rx and PFx?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Thanks and reagards,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p>posted by AndyWall</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633965199510000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633965199510000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>AndyWall</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Wes Dyer and Stephen Toub: Rx and Px - Working Together</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>They are orthogonal technologies.... There is no conspiracy here. </p>
<p>C</p>
<p>posted by Charles</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633965253520000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/Charles/Wes-Dyer-and-Stephen-Toub-Rx-and-Px-Working-Together#c633965253520000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>