A Look Behind Mouse 2.0 ver. 2.0
- Posted: May 21, 2010 at 3:46 PM
- 55,200 Views
- 5 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Very cool mouse.....
This research is interesting and I'm curious what lessons were learned. I imagine this research delved into new UI concepts. For example, the Orb mouse may feel very much at home if contextual menus were circular instead of up/down. Up/down menus require either a finger swipe (mouse 2.0) or wrist movement (mouse 1.0). Carefully crafted circular menus might only require a tap by the corresponding finger. Whether that would be advantageous or notm who knows.
That's what I was getting at with my question at 4:57. It seemed with these two mouses the focus was on hardware and function more than use planning.
that's awsome
so is the name "fab lab" by the way, just... super..
am guessing that they are also other team is
working on extending .net framework
to adapt with this new clicks and new gestures and so on
thats true ,right?
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close