<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - P&amp;P Symposium 2010 - The Commmand Query Separation Pattern - Chris Tavares</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/MichaelLehman/PP-Symposium-2010-The-Commmand-Query-Separation-Pattern-Chris-Tavares/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description> The Command Query Separation Pattern | Chris TavaresCQRS. A confusing jumble of letters? Well, yes, but it&#39;s also an architectural pattern which is rapidly gaining popularity today. It promises much better scalability and easier development that existing approaches. In this talk we&#39;ll look at what CQRS is, how it lives up to the promises, and what kinds of systems would benefit from this approach. </description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:23:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: P&amp;P Symposium 2010 - The Commmand Query Separation Pattern - Chris Tavares</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <p>I really liked how Chris presented this talk. While CQRS not directly applicable to my current projects, it does make me consider other options in their evolution.</p><p>posted by N2Cheval</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/MichaelLehman/PP-Symposium-2010-The-Commmand-Query-Separation-Pattern-Chris-Tavares#c634249356370000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/MichaelLehman/PP-Symposium-2010-The-Commmand-Query-Separation-Pattern-Chris-Tavares#c634249356370000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>N2Cheval</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: P&amp;P Symposium 2010 - The Commmand Query Separation Pattern - Chris Tavares</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Elegently described talk on this topic. I knew this design but didn't know it has a name making it easier to refer and remember.<p>posted by Shravan</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/MichaelLehman/PP-Symposium-2010-The-Commmand-Query-Separation-Pattern-Chris-Tavares#c634260598690000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/MichaelLehman/PP-Symposium-2010-The-Commmand-Query-Separation-Pattern-Chris-Tavares#c634260598690000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Shravan</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>