<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>HTML5 demo using the latest version of the&amp;nbsp;IE9 Platform Preview.
</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:51:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Not sure how happy I am when browser vendors point out their differences. Might be good for them, but just means web developers will have to continue to aim for the lowest common denominator.</p>
<p>posted by Flatliner</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086675070000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086675070000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Flatliner</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Nice demo! Can't wait to get my hands on the final product.</p>
<p>posted by exoteric</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086733900000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 16:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086733900000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>exoteric</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>The differences shown were not of <em>behavior</em> other than speed.</p>
<p>posted by MonkeyGuru</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086824630000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086824630000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyGuru</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>True, it's pretty lame to criticize IE for being fast. Then Chrome and Opera must also be criticized. That's competition - users will choose the fastest, most standards-compliant, secure, reliable browsers. IE looks well on the track to make an substantial
 impact again. One can only complement the IE team on this progress.</p>
<p>posted by exoteric</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086831840000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634086831840000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>exoteric</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>This comparison isn't exactly fair. IE9 is pre-release where as Firefox and Chrome are not. The correct comparision would include IE8.</p>
<p>posted by sayed.hashimi</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634088374950000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634088374950000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>sayed.hashimi</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>This is about IE 9. The question of fairness is meaningless.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On a different note, Opera 9.53 is blazingly fast and is now actually hardware accellerated to the point where it runs this demo faster than the IE 9 platform preview, at least on my machine. So the browser wars are insane at the moment, the IE team is getting
 a run for its money.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Still, IE 9 has other things such as DirectWrite text rendering, Does any other browser use that at the moment? It's impressively beautiful and animates smoothly (well actually the two animations I've seen shows that one of the animations are not quite as
 smooth as the other but they're both way beyond what other browsers do, it appears.</p>
<p>posted by exoteric</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634089433420000000</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 19:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634089433420000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>exoteric</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: IE9 HTML5 Demo</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I hope IE9 supports more HTML5 than the current BETA does. It only scores a 96 on html5test.com whereas Chrome scores 208 - the highest I have found. I am more interested in the forms, web apps, and storage features of HTML5 for our enterprise apps. IE9 is no better than IE8 in these categories. I could care less about the graphics stuff you are showing. Tell me when you have REAL HTML5 support.<p>posted by Gordo</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634239627390000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/NicFill/IE9-HTML5-Demo#c634239627390000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Gordo</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>