Patrice Godefroid - Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing with SAGE
- Posted: Jul 14, 2009 at 11:29 AM
- 57,321 Views
- 4 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
The Research in Software Engineering team (RiSE) coordinates Microsoft's research in Software Engineering in Redmond, USA.
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
cool
but isnt this pex? maybe sage is the new name for pex?
SAGE and Pex both use some of the same techniques (like DART), but SAGE is for security testing of unmanaged code (x86 binary analysis) while Pex is for unit testing of managed code (MSIL .NET binaries).
For more information on how they differ, please see http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/pg/public_psfiles/ieeesw2008.pdf
Patrice
i see, thanks
Makes you wonder just how many advances we are going to get because of symbolic anylsis of constraints.
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close