Omar Shahine - Inside Hotmail
- Posted: Feb 01, 2005 at 4:14 PM
- 69,557 Views
- 18 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Sadly, most of the mail I get via Hotmail is still from people trying to make money out of insecurities I don't have.
Sigh.
Or lately, pretending to be trying to deliver free gifts.
It's like the Reader's Digest has started selling Viagra...
Nice to know an idea about what kind of processes going on in the background for a service like Hotmail. Good job C9 to highlight the work going on at Hotmail.

Omar, in any of those background services is there a filter to send all emails from Gmail to the junk folder
Arnix
I stummbled on this the other day, not tried it yet but could be useful if you want to use pop3.
http://www.freepops.org
Stephen.
I'm not able to view the video - so apologies if this has been answered in the video.
I seem to recall Hotmail stopped supporting Pop3 several years ago now, only supporting their http protocol for access via Outlook (and a few other clients). Now it appears that they may be removing that access for their new Outlook Live subscribtion service. The arguement being that such advanced services should be paid for and that similar services have the same policy.
Shame really especially as gmail has just started providing pop3 and RSS support. I really like Hotmail for all it's faults but losing standard outlook integration may just kill it for me. Last time I was burned by hotmail was with the calender. I used to use it all the time then it went to being a paid for service so I lost all the personal data I had in it - now it's free again but there's almost zero chance I'll trust that with my data again.
Now I find that I may no longer be able to archive important emails via outlook (which costs a fair bit in itself) with the potential to lose valuable data agian.
Still can't complain too much, especially now we have 250mb storage and they've got rid of those damn screwy framed hyperlinks in my mails (whoever thought that was a good idea).
Whilst other services add new revolutionary features, the most known example of which is Gmail, Hotmail remains the same old service. Where is a new look, a faster response time, fewer clutter, especially ads, better search and organization facilities, pop3 & imap forwarding (like the out of office assistant), calendar and mail offline backup, rss feeds, Hotmail integration with the desktop or deskbar and with other MSN services, etc, etc. If Microsoft has made one of the best e-mail clients Office Outlook, why not make Hotmail a little as feature rich as this client. At least a little. Hotmail has too many customers and Microsoft is losing them to Gmail. Many of my friend have or think of switching. Why not at least try to upgrate some of Hotmail's offerings, re-energize the Hotmail brand. At least at a minimum? Even the 250 MB is ooooo slow in coming. Yahoo! had upgrated their service much faster. Currently, Google not Hotmail is the cool service.
You need to introduce some new and advanced features and do it now not next next year. Users in this age rely a lot on e-mail. Given that Hotmail is the most popular free service, in order to remain so, needs to work on a new version.
Perhaps MSN should add the ability for online file storage. Like Yahoo briefcase but 250 mb. Why not. After all, this is what people really want, not very large inboxes, but a common large online storage place, easily accessible, like from My Network Places. And remember 2 or even 10 or 30 mb nowadays is a joke.
as i know, Outlook also needs Hotmail plugs .
I was intrigued that MS employees have lots of software available to them, although custom made and non-supported it would be good to try it out too for myself. I do not and probably never will work for MS, and so how about a section on Channel 9 that aggregates at least the released software from MS employees personal sites.
Channel 9 is all about an insight into Microsoft, how it works, what it’s up to and where it’s going. I see a software section as a natural evolution of this showing not necessarily official beta MS software but employee’s personal software.
To get everything in one place would be great, I can’t remember all the employee links. If it works who knows it will probably lead to product improvements.
Why be happy with no POP3 or a small inbox, just sign up for google mail it's leagues better than hotmail.
I have a free invites if anybody wants any, send me a note.
Mike
Can you also tell us if you are generally satisfied with the Hotmail service as it is today and if you can tell us of any planed additions or improvements. Are users happy with the current look and feel? What is the top issues that you are asked to fix?
Great video.
This video gave me a new thing to think about, I want to know how this header/message stuff works. How do keep the header and filename together, do you save the message as xml file or just as binary, etc.
Because if u get billions of messenges a day how do you save that as a file? number.msg would not work since u run out of numbers fast if u get billions of email messenges a day. Is there some kind of book that describes this technique or is there a term where i can google on? Anyone with some hints?
Thanks in Advance
I'm sorry, i don't like wma. I find the format bulky, and everytime i rip music, windows media player asks if i'm sure i don't want to go back to wma instead of mp3. I don't like wma.
Also, the majority of stuff ripped from an mp3 is stuff beyond the human audiable range. If you're upset about that, maybe you're being a little too picky.
I do like the digital right managment with wma, but it would be nice if Windows Media Player could make an mp3 from a wav file or save the audio from a video file to mp3 or wma. I can only make mp3s and wma from a CD, that totally anonys me!
Chris
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close