Scott Guthrie - Demo of next version of ASP.NET (Happy Birthday Video #1)
- Posted: Apr 05, 2005 at 10:01 PM
- 63,106 Views
- 31 Comments
Download
How do I download the videos?
- To download, right click the file type you would like and pick “Save target as…” or “Save link as…”
Why should I download videos from Channel9?
- It's an easy way to save the videos you like locally.
- You can save the videos in order to watch them offline.
- If all you want is to hear the audio, you can download the MP3!
Which version should I choose?
- If you want to view the video on your PC, Xbox or Media Center, download the High Quality WMV file (this is the highest quality version we have available).
- If you'd like a lower bitrate version, to reduce the download time or cost, then choose the Medium Quality WMV file.
- If you have a Zune, WP7, iPhone, iPad, or iPod device, choose the low or medium MP4 file.
- If you just want to hear the audio of the video, choose the MP3 file.
Right click “Save as…”
- Mid Quality WMV (Lo-band, Mobile)
- WMV (WMV Video)
As part of our birthday celebration, we took a trip back to see Scott Guthrie, Product Unit Manager on Web Platform and Tools team, and get a demo of the next version of ASP.NET (er, Visual Studio 2005 for Web Development).
We specifically talk about Web Standards Features in the next version of Visual Studio. Microsoft talking about Web Standards? Huh?
Listen in.
We specifically talk about Web Standards Features in the next version of Visual Studio. Microsoft talking about Web Standards? Huh?
Listen in.
Comments Closed
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
A long video so I got a couple of questions:
For HTML intellisense we have a standard schema that people can use to implement the intellisense rules. I think it is XSD based (although need to double-check) to make it extensible and allow you to add your own new html formats to the list.
We do provide built-in validation/intellisense support for XHTML strict as well as for transitional.
Hope this helps,
Scott
I played around with Web Developer Beta 1 and had to stop using it because I felt like I was teasing myself. I'm really looking forward to Beta 2. Any news on when it'll get pushed out?
Is this fixed in beta 2?
If not, will it be fixed in the release?
We took a lot of pain with accessibility on datagrid. Even the ASP.NET 1.1 Rollout fix that claimed compliance with accessibility legislation only fixed the problem with header tags being generated as tds and added a caption property - the required table 'summary' property was not included and trying to get label for working with radio buttons in a data grid - well let's not go there. Is this sort of issue going to be fixed in Whidby?
Hmm, is he sick?
mVPstar
Heheh, great video though. My team's really dying to move to VS2005 almost solely for the HTML editor enhancements.
I am extremely impressed with the new level of respectful intimacy and thoughtfulness in this release. The Express editions will blow Macromedia tools out of the water. My brand new copy of Dreamweaver MX 2004 can't even keep tab windows open without flickering them from time to time.
Due date seems to be April 25th.
http://www.microsoft.com/emea/msdn/betaexperience/
grtz
koen
Oh, I love these videos about VS.NET 2005, please make more of them, because 50 mins is way too short to explain all the exciting new stuff!!! You should do a Whidbey video every week, each time discussing only one or a few new features, but really going deep into them!
Hm, I noticed something that bothered me in Beta1 already: if you add a new file to your project, it opens in source mode by default (so it's showing the html for an aspx page for example instead of the designer like it used to be). I think most of the time you start working in design mode (dragging controls to your page etc.) so that should really be the default display mode. Why was this changed?
Maybe not every week, but you'll see more.
We changed the default from loading the page in the designer to the source editor because we've seen a number of developers say that prefer source mode over a design surface.
The good news is that you can configure the behavior anyway you want -- just go to the preferences dialog box if you prefer design-mode when opening files. We'll then honor it anytime you open one.
Hope this helps,
Scott
You can actually export and import all settings within VS 2005 to XML files. This makes it easy to copy them from machine to machine, as well as use them in group developer scenarios.
Just go to the Tools->Import and Export Settings menu item and a wizard will walk you through it.
Hope this helps,
Scott
Keep up the good work.
We don't officially support classic ASP with VS 2005, although I was just playing around with it and you'll probably find that you get an ok experience.
Specifically, because there is no longer a project file for web-projects, you don't have to worry about adding it to "a project" in order for the files to show up. Instead just copy a .asp file into you site directory and you are good to go.
There is still some intellisense support for classic ASP in the text editor. I noticed that objects like request, response, etc do have code statement completion. You also get full support for HTML statement completion, xhtml validation, tag navigator, etc support for classic ASP contnet.
Hope this helps. I'd recommend downloading the Visual Web Developer express edition when the beta comes out and giving it a try to see if this meets your classic asp needs.
Thanks,
Scott
Hi Irascian,
The WCAG and 508 guidelines don't say much about using 'strong' in place of 'b'. We are looking into it more, though, to see if there is a formal recommendation. I believe JAWS (the most popular screen reader out there) fully supports both.
The "summary" attribute for a table is actually a pri3 WCAG requirement. You can add it with both ASP.NET 1.1 and ASP.NET 2.0 by setting a "summary" attribute on the 'asp: datagrid' or 'asp: gridview' controls. This will then be passed through to the output as an expando property.
Radiobuttons and checkboxes inside a datagrid now output a 'for' attribute which associates them with the corresponding label element -- so this should no longer be a problem with ASP.NET V2.0. I have a code workaround that I can send you for ASP.NET V1.1 that shows how to-do that today (unfortunately this doesn't work built-in).
Hope this helps,
Scott
I've been reading that b and i are deprecataed and should be avoided for some time now and certainly worked in several shops where it's been explained to me that b and i are semantically meaningless where strong and em aren't and are better supported by JAWS (I haven't got JAWS installed so have no idea of the truth of this) - hence my assumption they should not be used.
I've actually got radio buttons working inside grid controls although the code is pretty hacky involving the usual inheritance and some rather shady work with client-side ids.
As a final note I guess my big request here is I hope the documentation for the controls and/or the intellisense documents these new features. Ideally we need a one-to-one mapping between server control attributes and the HTML they generate, which has always been seriously lacking up to now. When trying to make the datagrid more DDA-compliant I found four pages of advice on google groups (yeah, yeah I know!) telling me that the datagrid didn't support th generation from header elements with reply after reply saying "use the repeater instead - it's the only way" before I hit the ASP.NET 1.1 rollout fix solution on page 5 of the results list, with its mention of the new attribute (I don't have the fix details to hand but I think it was "UseAccessibility=true"). The hotfix note claiming this made the datagrid compliant mentioned nothing about "summary" (only "caption") so I ended up with my own control inheriting from datagrid that overwrites the "render" method, and traps write element and write attribute events so that when a table element is being output it sets a flag and then that flag causes the attribute render event to do an AddAttribute for the missing "summary" tag. I guess I'll be reworking that hack on Monday
We've used a similar technique to remove invalid attributes (that appear to not even be used anyway) on the validation summary control so if there's any attributes there that might help remove those hacks we'd be interested to hear of them, or where the best place for finding out where some of this stuff is documented.
Anyway, thanks again. The answers given here and in the other thread have helped resolve issues that have been troubling developes at several shops I've worked at for some time. I'm looking forward to getting the beta 2 to do some hand on myself later this month.
I'll check it out.
To Scott Guthrie and your team -
The features you guys have implemented in this release absolutely rocks. I'm a relatively new ASP.NET developer and I was trying to use VS 2003 for my development. But, creating so many new files automatically (as VS 2003 does) is more than a little disconcerting for a new developer.
I found myself hand-coding all my ASP.NET stuff in Homesite+ just for the simplicity and the fact that it allows me to focus on the code rather than wonder what the heck VS is doing to my files. After the great experience of designing/testing Windows forms apps in VS 2003, trying to build ASP.NET apps was a pain by comparison. I think it's a case where more (as in more automation) was not better - it was just more.
Nevertheless, I really like the approach you guys seem to be taking with VS 2005. Personally, I also like the default setting of opening in source view rather than design view.
Anyway, great work, guys! Keep it up!
DaveSea (Dave in Seattle)
I almost wept when I found out that visual studio leaves my html code alone between view modes
I loved the way <script> showed a squiggely red error for not supplying the mandatory type attribute
It really shows that you're starting to take some consideration towards the real needs of webdevelopers, and for that I am finding it much easier to accept using tools such as VS.
Thankyou guys!
my worries
intellisense and standards
I think it's a bit poor though, that intellisense schemas are provided through choice, and not by the DTD explicity defined.
adaptive rendering
Also, asp.net uses an 'adaptive rendering' engine, which made me have to stay til' 2am last night to fix an issue with firefox!
Sniffing a UAString is WRONG WRONG WRONG! I hope this is fixed in Whidbey.
collapsable html trees
Collapsable html is a welcome feature, but sometimes even in codebehind mode it confuses me!
It's difficult to see how far my code reaches down a page, when i expand the tree.
It's a usability gripe, but maybe you guys should consider having a faded colour behind the expanded tree that was recently collapsed, so developers can overview what just happened?
How can I save this video, when I click [Save] it opens up a new window then fires my Media Player, but I cant seem to find any option to save this complete video instead of streaming.
Zubair Dot Net
Hi,
Thanks for putting this together. I've got one query, Scott mentioned a website several times that would have the V2 quickstarts posted. I could not make out the address he quoted.
Can anyone help me out here?
there ya go
I would love to only need one tool, currently I use both. Best of luck VS team!
2 years to fix VS from modifying HTML source.. wow, I really hope it does preserve HTML source from the designer to the text editor!
I can't wait to use VS2005
Sincerely,
David Dimmer
Director of Development
Fyin, Inc.
Local: (414) 431-8674
Toll free: (800) 680-2326
Fax: (414) 431-8704
W: http://www.fyin.com
Complete Website Design and Interactive Programming
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close