Stephen Toulouse - What does "responsible disclosure" mean to you?
- Posted: Aug 31, 2004 at 6:47 PM
- 15,061 Views
- 3 Comments
Download
How do I download the videos?
- To download, right click the file type you would like and pick “Save target as…” or “Save link as…”
Why should I download videos from Channel9?
- It's an easy way to save the videos you like locally.
- You can save the videos in order to watch them offline.
- If all you want is to hear the audio, you can download the MP3!
Which version should I choose?
- If you want to view the video on your PC, Xbox or Media Center, download the High Quality WMV file (this is the highest quality version we have available).
- If you'd like a lower bitrate version, to reduce the download time or cost, then choose the Medium Quality WMV file.
- If you have a Zune, WP7, iPhone, iPad, or iPod device, choose the low or medium MP4 file.
- If you just want to hear the audio of the video, choose the MP3 file.
Right click “Save as…”
- Mid Quality WMV (Lo-band, Mobile)
- WMV (WMV Video)
Microsoft's Security Response Center gets a lot of email sent to its
secure@microsoft.com alias. Stephen kept talking about "responsible disclosure" with us so we wanted to find out just what he meant by that.
Comments Closed
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
If more people knew what the security teams and developers at Microsoft had to deal with, then I think there'd be a lot less hate going in their direction.
Why don't they tell you intimate details about security flaws in the software? This video explains that excellently.
Why don't they make their software standards-compliant? If they did and they broke even one single app that depended on that non-standard behavior, then you'd hate them for that instead.
Once again, keep it up guys! Just letting you know that you've still got at least one fan cheering you on!
That's a good - well, interesting - argument for not fixing a standards-incompliant piece of software. It leaves open the question "why didn't they make it standards-compliant in the first place?"
Usually because the 'standard' was written after the design was frozen.
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close