<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - ASP.net hanganalys med WinDbg - Del 1</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/deurell/ASPnet-hanganalys-med-WinDbg-Del-1/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Vi g&#229;r igenom en simulerad l&#229;g cpu asp.net h&#228;ngning med WinDbg.

Allt detta f&#246;r att se hur meckigt det blir att fixa detta i produktion. I del tv&#229; av denna screencast f&#229;ngar vi detta innan prod med hj&#228;lp av profiling och loadtest i VSTS Test.
</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:04:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
</channel>
</rss>