<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - To Video Blog in HD or Not?</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/erik/To-Video-Blog-in-HD-or-Not/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>That IS the question at the Blog Business Summit.&amp;nbsp; Ok, they&#39;re talking about a lot of other things there too, but that one seems very interesting to me.HD is something we&#39;ve been talking about for quite a while, but haven&#39;t been working on it aggressively for some of the reasons mentioned in the blog entry I linked to.&amp;nbsp; It&#39;s still too early in my opinion.&amp;nbsp; One of the main reasons we want to do HD is to get some of our content up on Xbox Live Marketplace, where only HD video lives.&amp;nbsp; Here on the internet, bandwidth still seems to be the limiting factor.How entries are edited is also mentioned in the article.&amp;nbsp; Our sister site, Channel 9, does pretty much no editing at all.&amp;nbsp; Here on 10, we do edit our videos to help with the presentation, but even here, we&amp;nbsp;DON&#39;T do a TON of editing.&amp;nbsp; The focus on both sites is the content and the people, not the video style.It was really interesting reading that article as it went very much against the presenters and I tend to agree.&amp;nbsp; What do you all think?&amp;nbsp; What are the advantages of HD content at this point?&amp;nbsp; What about how much videos are edited or not?</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:03:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: To Video Blog in HD or Not?</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I don't mind the lack of HD content at present, but I wouldn't mind seeing the occasional Microsoft 10 content available on Xbox live marketplace.&nbsp; By content, I don't necessarily mean your daily segments.&nbsp; You could offer themes or gaming segments, but I'd limit the segments available because they're likely to eat up a considerable amount of space on the cramped 20GB hard drive (only 13GB out of the box).<br><br>I highly support video editing.&nbsp; I'm not saying Microsoft 10 needs a theme song or title and credit sequences either, but editing refines the videos and makes them much more pleasant to watch.&nbsp; I can understand the desire to keep the videos as original and uninterrupted as possible, but good editing really cleans up the presentation and makes the segments look professional.&nbsp; I enjoy seeing the logo bar with a person's name come up on screen during a segment or the closing logo animation and &quot;boom&quot; at the conclusion.&nbsp; That's my take on the subject.<br><p>posted by Matthew Mushall</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/erik/To-Video-Blog-in-HD-or-Not#c632977814680000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/erik/To-Video-Blog-in-HD-or-Not#c632977814680000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Mushall</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>