Taking Efficiency One Step Further - F#
- Posted: Jun 19, 2009 at 4:23 AM
- 8,307 Views
- 4 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Thanks for posting this. It is the start of a compelling argument for me to explore this language further. F# information seems very fragmented in blogs, sample chapters of future books, etc For me, F# needs an "Annotated Reference Manual" equivalent.
However we make do, and this was good. Are there videos of the other two talks Oliver Sturm gave?
Thanks.
We're in the process of getting the rest of the devdays videos online. We're still waiting for the videos. We have to process them and upload them to channel9. Lot of work. I would suggest you subscribe to this RSS feed: http://channel9.msdn.com/tags/DevDays+2009+NL/RSS/ you will get notified when we post new videos.
Inmiddels een paar maanden verder. Hoe staat het met de andere filmpjes?
I t was very interesting. I was wondering if anyone knows the reason behind a specifict F# design decision.
About the pipe operator: |>
Why is a |> b c interpreted as a |> (b c) instead of (a |> b) c ? Isn't left to right most logical?
A more specific example:
let multiply a b = a * b;;
let substract a b = a - b;;
multiply 2 3 |> substract 10;;
returns 4
so it is interpreted as:
multiply 2 3 |> (substract 10);;
while it seems logical to interpret this as:
(multiply 2 3 |> substract) 10;;
----
furthermore, in response to the question from your audience, about inserting the middle parameter, you could have answerd:
let answer a b c = a / b - c;;
if you want to insert the middle parameter b,
(multiply 2 3 |> answer 30) 4;;
will yield the desired result...
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close