Concurrent Programming with .NET4 Collections
- Posted: Nov 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM
- 25,150 Views
- 5 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
See all videos in this series.
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Thanks for the tour of the new concurrent data structures available in .Net 4.0 - some good stuff in there! I also wanted to thank Steve for his presentation at CINNUG a few weeks back on parallel programming in .Net 4.0. I enjoyed it greatly and look forward to being able to use some of this on my own projects.
This one looks nice. Not at all like the complete hack job "Countdown Synchronization Primitive" that I do hope they will be telling us has been fixed or removed.
this presider speaks too fast, we need time to consume the newborn thing whatever they are. So i hope there is a little interval to understand them. Thank you.
The bag rocks.
@Simon Gao: if watching in Windows Media Player, you can slow down the playback using the built in enhancements.
I'm curious about what pattern is recommended for when a Try... operation fails. For example, one might consider this without too much thought:
string myValue; while(!myQueue.TryDequeue(out myValue)){} //now I have my value...Because in that case, I really really needed my value as soon as possible... Lets say I don't spin on the TryDequeue like above, what are the alternatives? Timer retry?
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close