<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Speeding up Parallel.For using the Range Partitioner</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/philpenn/Speeding-up-ParallelFor-using-the-Range-Partitioner/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>
Join Danny Shih as he demonstrates using the range partitioner feature.&amp;nbsp; Parallel.For is great, but being a general solution, it does not perform optimally for certain specific scenarios, such as when there are a ton of iterations and very little work per
 iteration.&amp;nbsp; In these cases, the range partitioner can be used to speed things up. 
Learn more about&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;.NET Framework 4&amp;nbsp;and keep abreast of Parallel Computing tools and techniques via the

Concurrency Dev Center. 
See all videos in this 
series. 
</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:16:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Speeding up Parallel.For using the Range Partitioner</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Nice video, thank you -- one wish though, please do the recording when you are in good shape (no cold).</p>
<p>posted by macias</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/philpenn/Speeding-up-ParallelFor-using-the-Range-Partitioner#c633939525680000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/philpenn/Speeding-up-ParallelFor-using-the-Range-Partitioner#c633939525680000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>macias</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Speeding up Parallel.For using the Range Partitioner</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Cool, I've had to do the manual partitioning of structures before, and yeah its tidious... great addition! (I hope you get better!)</p>
<p>posted by bangoker</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/philpenn/Speeding-up-ParallelFor-using-the-Range-Partitioner#c633939854580000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/philpenn/Speeding-up-ParallelFor-using-the-Range-Partitioner#c633939854580000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>bangoker</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>