Virtual Earth: MSN's answer to Google Maps
- Posted: May 24, 2005 at 12:22 AM
- 598,582 Views
- 57 Comments
Download
How do I download the videos?
- To download, right click the file type you would like and pick “Save target as…” or “Save link as…”
Why should I download videos from Channel9?
- It's an easy way to save the videos you like locally.
- You can save the videos in order to watch them offline.
- If all you want is to hear the audio, you can download the MP3!
Which version should I choose?
- If you want to view the video on your PC, Xbox or Media Center, download the High Quality WMV file (this is the highest quality version we have available).
- If you'd like a lower bitrate version, to reduce the download time or cost, then choose the Medium Quality WMV file.
- If you have a Zune, WP7, iPhone, iPad, or iPod device, choose the low or medium MP4 file.
- If you just want to hear the audio of the video, choose the MP3 file.
Right click “Save as…”
- Mid Quality WMV (Lo-band, Mobile)
- WMV (WMV Video)
I spent some time today interviewing the Virtual Earth team. This is MSN's answer to Google Maps, coming in July 2005. As you see in the video MSN Virtual Earth goes noticeably further than Google Maps or other mapping services.
Later today we'll put the video I shot of them up on Channel 9.
Here's first look: WMV video of Virtual Earth Team. 133MB.
Also, there have been a ton of news stories about Virtual Earth. Here's some links:
News.com article on Virtual Earth.
And in 85 other articles on Google News.
This stuff is mondo cool!
Later today we'll put the video I shot of them up on Channel 9.
Here's first look: WMV video of Virtual Earth Team. 133MB.
Also, there have been a ton of news stories about Virtual Earth. Here's some links:
News.com article on Virtual Earth.
And in 85 other articles on Google News.
This stuff is mondo cool!
Comments Closed
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Steve Lombardi, program manager (guy talking most of the time).
Cody Ebberson, sitting on left side of couch, software design engineer.
Harish Jayanti, software design engineer.
Tom Barclay, researcher
My favourite result from google maps - go to maps.google.co.uk, zoom in to an area, search for "pub" in tha map area below.
It takes you Pueblo Memorial Airport, Colarado, USA.
Err... I'm not sure thats in my local area...
'{this.baseURL="http://mt.google.com/mt?";
if(window._tv&&window._tv.length>0)
{this.baseURL+="v="+encodeURIComponent(window._tv)+"&"}}}'
from http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/maps.keyhole.3.js.
but where is china?
As to drawing your own routes, yes, but not sure what you mean by "drawing." I think the route builder will work just like http://mappoint.msn.com works today when showing a route between two points.
So basically i'd get a map of the area and be able to draw a red line along the oute that i want and then the map program would make my line nice and neat and scale the map appropiately so that it can fit on a peice of paper or maybe synch it to a PDA and GPS facility.
Can't wait to see it all done
World WInd -- the NASA free "Virtual Earth" that runs on windows PC's
they both for example use USGS data.
No credit to the TerraServer?
With Longhorn's 3dUI this is going to be really cool!
Will there be a smaller version of the video up soon? I'd like to share this with some of the guys on the this side of the pond
cheers!
Kosso
I just downloaded it last night and its very nice. This .net program features 3D terrain, various types of satellite imagery, and you can even watch animated events occur (volcanic eruptions, forest fires, etc.).
Erik.
But that name is going to come back and bite if you don't get 90-95% of your average internet browsers' countries in there.
Also how will local small businesses or groups plug into this map, its all very well that the big guys get a look in but what about art galleries that just set up shop, or voluntary groups that have meetings on such and such a date, even festivals
Does the map change to different modes i.e. spring time the autumn leaves falling off, or evening when the building lights are on and things are dark, celebrations with lights up and what about disasters like freak floods. Can the map be altered for this?
Eagle eye mode seems good, but what about when a new building is made, how will Microsoft incorporate or even become aware of a change in the landscape
My main concern is the emphasis on ‘exploring the environment”, that’s okay for today but many on holiday like to know the history of an area. It would be a shame to have a one size fits all approach that the USA map has at present, as the US does not have much history, history is worth exploring and other countries have much that this kind of web app could exploit
So when these guys get round to doing maps of, well just about every other region of the earth from the EU countries and Russia to the far east with the oriental continents and Arabian Emirates; they all have a lot of history with stories attached to them.
I would like to see a mode called 'history mode' that allows the person exploring to read up on the history of the area they are looking at: e.g. this are used to be grass land (an option alters the model to show how it was) the locals used to work in mills where their produce was exported to such and such country (and have links to other areas of the globe of that period and then show what that industry is today) I can see some kind of tie in with Encarta.
People willing to explore sections of an area would give time to read its history, if a counter was used say (in time machine mode) it would change much of the landscape to grass and trees and then show areas that today sell locally made jams or cheeses, or printing firms that still have links back to that period.
These are my immediate feelings on what the map could mean to me and others, allowing them to follow trails such I did from a book touring round the battle scarred boarders between Scotland and England (UK) where there are many Heritage Trees dating back several hundred and even a thousand or more years. Some thing like this plotted out would be great, I would like to have blogged my experiences and meet other interested in the same things.
P.S. I feel sorry for these guys, they all seem to have big bags under their eyes.
The history idea sounds fantastic.
Shame it could be a while to get UK arial/satellite shots, I think the only lot done have been commerical (and pretty expensive).
1) Try to have a good print view. I know it's not always easy when you're dealing with AJAX/JS development.
2) If you could add construction data...
3) Also, if there's some type of API that could be available, that would be great!
Thanks,
Dan
My dads in chicago, he's staying i dunno at a ramada or something and he wants to goto one of the big malls out of town. SO he has a Dell Axim and makes a route on MSN maps and saves it, it then offers an RSS feed which he can subcribe too. When he subscribes o it, he starts getting information about traffic conditions and other various things so that before he sets off on his adventure he knows that 4th and 8th street just had a glue lorry tip over and it's taking a long time to get cars moving past there, thus the map can offer a new route.
scoble, basically bring a notepad to london meet (a big notepad and lots of Jones Cream Soda)
I think you would be suprised. World wind uses Landsat 7 data which goes down to 1 pixel / 15 metres resolution for the entire surface of the earth. I believe there are arial photographs of the entire UK freely avaible from a top-down perspective to greater res than that. The 45% angle images would be a different issue, but you could not get those for the entire US anyway, and you certainly would not get them all for the entire UK either.
I know it has been mentioned before in this thread but I would urge anyone intrested in this stuff to check out World wind. Its an educational tool rather than a geographical search engine, but it is super cool.
Re the video - the smooth zooming is to me the coolest thing. Thats some amazing Javascript!
Microsoft already has been in the "Google range", several times. Then they do a stock split.
With Pictometry, a very hot little company now, the 45 degree angle thing is cool, but it will be hard to compete with Google Earth and Keyhole application for panning and zooming at various angles. The ideal would be a combination of Pictometry and the true-fly-through capabilities of Keyhole - skyline-esque approach.
Search the world. The key difference, on a contrary point, is the price-point. MSN Virtual Earth will be free and Google Earth will be $30.00 for Keyhole client.
Also, note - think about right-click save as, and how to get geospatial intelligence out from system, and packaged, and sent around. Also, think about digital to analog transforms.
Congrats to the MapPoint Team for matching such an impact.
Well done with WSJ by the way - well orchestrated from interview with BIll, pre-hype on Virtual Earth, and then announcement, and pre-release. Interesting to see Barclay involved. I was wondering when he would be involved.
Nice job to Pictometry for getting this win. Huge for them.
WorldWind runs circles around Keyhole viewer (Google) on my desktop....
I especially like the ability to switch instantly between photo and topological maps.... I can see a terrain item I'm interested in and then switch (if I'm looking at the US) to a USGS map with roads, navigational aids (if in coastal waters, etc.)
Extremely responsive with 3D graphics support... dog on old systems with limited graphics accellerators.
Do keep in mind that Microsoft has excelled at working on the OS and on-built APIs that enable a whole bunch of developers to exercise their creativity in many different directions. By the way, Google Maps would not have been nearly as cool without XMLHTTP, which first appeared in IE 5+ and was coopted by Mozilla and put inside Firefox. The AJAX technology is in fact quite simple in ASP.NET, as has been demonstrated here:
http://www.objectgraph.com/dictionary/how.html
Google really has it easy, when they can simply customize a Linux distro (for them, OSS == free capital upon which to innovate) for their thousands of servers. And then they can build on top of the XMLHTTP framework that MS has put out years ago. And these "amazing" projects are simply some guy's 20% time contribution that percolated to the top. But they definitely ramp up the expectation with regard to simplicity and performance, which is a good thing for everyone.
I have some suggestions, i dont know if this has been thought of.
I may not be a full time user of mappoint/streetsand trips sw, as i may wish to go out on weekends only. so ideally speaking i may end up using the sw i buy for what about 60 days an year.
If i'm a web user for suppose mappoint and not bought the mappoint sw, i should be able to zoom in and save the maps into my laptop as jpeg images so that i can use them offline.
Also my last question still stands:
"How does that 45 angle work, form what nauticle direction is the camera facing. Is it flexible enough to pan 360deg round the building? How could it be justified to capture the best face of one building at the sacrafice of another?"
Can anyone help?
Samuel
mVPstar
This service is said to be launched in early July and it's already the middle of that month - has it already been launched? Is it open for public testing? If yes, can somebody post a link to the service?
VIRTUAL EARTH MUST INCLUDE ALL SIGHTS WHERE CHANNEL 9 GUY HAS BEEN SPOTTED OR PHOTOGRAPHED BEFORE GOING LIVE. (I think the little guy is gonna be on the space shuttle soon, so these guys better get live yesterday... )
It works great in firefox, but I doubt safari integration is done yet
I tried it on Konqueror and it crashed.
Internet Explorer on Windows XP worked without any software issues but it sure is slow. I noticed the tiles not loading as I was zooming in or panning. It was pretty annoying to tell you the truth.
Google Maps can drill in a bit further than Virtual Earth can. Once you get to a certain point (below 150 yards) I get a picture of a camera with a slash through it indicating that I have zoomed to far. Google will let you zoom in as far as you can and still display images albeit blurry.
I don't think Microsoft has quite done it yet in terms of beating Google. I think they are definitely in the neighborhood though, but the UI is a tad clunky. Google is much simpler to use.
I am also a subscriber to Google Earth so I can tell you with pretty good accuracy that it is far more superior than Virtual Earth. Microsoft might want to consider that rich client after all if they intend to compete. Also, why bother with such limited data? Get the whole friggin world out there already. They bragged about the fact that they have been working with cartography for 10+ years but they come out with the US only? Someone is asleep at the wheel.
My main complaint right now is the clunky UI and the speed. did anyone notice that there is a limit on the scratch pad? I got an error saying that I had reached my maximum number of scratch pad entries. I think I only had 4 or 5. Anyone hear of a scroll bar? lol
Microsoft has done a pretty good job of reverse engineering what Google has done but they are not there yet. I say give it 6 months to a year before we see significant improvements. I hope to see those other features talked about in the taped interview soon.
SilverEye, allows the rapid creation of 3D urban models from a single image.
Smart Digitizer is essentially a stand-alone tool for building GIS features: roads, rivers, hydrants, etc.
GlobeView has the ability to access data from a number of sources including servers supporting the Web Map Service Specification (WMS) from the Open Geospatial Consortium and Microsoft's own TerraServer.
So there is some competition with Google Earth in future.
As for my Prof, he is on leave (sabbastical) & having good vacation somewhere out there.
Do you think Microsoft virtual earth will ever be able to compete with Google's service?
Especially with them both being huge companies, and am I correct to assume Google has had more time to allow for growth than Microsoft!?
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close