<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Design for a multimillion thin client market with RemoteFX</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/BUILD2011/SAC-428T/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>The next version of RDP and RemoteFX in Windows extends the rich experiences for the remote desktop user, be it Terminal Server (RDSH), VDI or MultiPoint Server. As customers embrace and deploy Windows, they will be asking their vendors to extend these experiences to new devices and form factors that will lower the cost of the deployment without compromising the user experience. If you want to address a market of millions of devices by building on the RemoteFX platform, this session is for you.</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 07:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 07:32:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Design for a multimillion thin client market with RemoteFX</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <p>Will this technology (remoteFX)&nbsp;be available for 1:1 scenerios. Win8 client&nbsp;to Win8 client? We let people work from home occasionally but the current remote desktop experience is insufficient graphics-wise but the bandwidth is already plenty. The idea is they can remote into their desktops and continue working.</p><p>posted by benyaboy</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/BUILD2011/SAC-428T#c634523220946646277</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:01:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/BUILD2011/SAC-428T#c634523220946646277</guid>
		<dc:creator>benyaboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>