<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Bart De Smet: Rx, LINQ, AMA </title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ch9Live/Channel-9-Live-at-Tech-Ed-Europe-2012/Bart-De-Smet-Rx-LINQ-AMA/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>The great Bart J.F. De Smet joins Charles Torre for a conversation about Rx, LINQ and whatever else comes up - questions come in from the Internet via Twitter. Thanks to those of you who submitted questions! That&#39;s why we do this  </description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:06:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:06:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Bart De Smet: Rx, LINQ, AMA </title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>Again, i'd just to clarify, the reason im on about&nbsp;Bcl is that i think it would greatly speed Rx adoption <em>within the framework itself</em>.. i'd like to see more apis expose iobservables especially in wpf/xaml.. rx support in databinding? yes please <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /> language support? one can dream..</p><p>I&nbsp;think rx is a really fondational technology that almost every app can use. its the same (but opposite) as IEnumerable for crying out loud <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p><p>i ask you this,&nbsp;what could .net be like if only the IEnumerable interface was in the Bcl and all the combinators lived in a separate library?</p><p>I&nbsp;really hope you dont think i'm trying to troll you or be a jerk, i just think rx is awsome and the bar of entry should be as low as it could possibly get</p><p>posted by aL3891</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ch9Live/Channel-9-Live-at-Tech-Ed-Europe-2012/Bart-De-Smet-Rx-LINQ-AMA#c634775559532573878</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ch9Live/Channel-9-Live-at-Tech-Ed-Europe-2012/Bart-De-Smet-Rx-LINQ-AMA#c634775559532573878</guid>
		<dc:creator>aL3891</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Bart De Smet: Rx, LINQ, AMA </title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Events/Ch9Live/Channel-9-Live-at-Tech-Ed-Europe-2012/Bart-De-Smet-Rx-LINQ-AMA#c634775559532573878">aL3891</a>: Of course we don't think you're trolling, man! The key issue - in my opinion - is that once you embed Rx into the BCL then:</p><p>a) Bart and company will lose agility (and most likely full control over its evolution...)</p><p>b) Rx updates become locked into BCL's updates (so, versioning is slowed down, see a)</p><p>c) Erik will lose even more hair&nbsp; <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p><p>C</p><p>posted by Charles</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ch9Live/Channel-9-Live-at-Tech-Ed-Europe-2012/Bart-De-Smet-Rx-LINQ-AMA#c634780797195887999</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ch9Live/Channel-9-Live-at-Tech-Ed-Europe-2012/Bart-De-Smet-Rx-LINQ-AMA#c634780797195887999</guid>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>