<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Galois started out using Haskell because it was our first love. This talk will be about why we *still* use it. Yes, we still love Haskell, but as the Beatles said, love don&#39;t pay the bills. I&#39;ll present some recent projects that show different aspects of our use of Haskell, giving a sense of what Haskell brings to the table, closing with a more nuanced answer to the question of why we still use -- and love -- Haskell. </description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:40:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>I'm very fond on Haskell, and I'm looking forward to seeing this talk. When the video will be available? <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p><p>posted by CharlesStain</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634692067353183827</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634692067353183827</guid>
		<dc:creator>CharlesStain</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>Oh, Is finally online! Fantastic talk, really enjoyed it!</p><p>posted by CharlesStain</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634692966644895363</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:11:04 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634692966644895363</guid>
		<dc:creator>CharlesStain</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[While I agree that Haskell is really nice in small book examples, I have to admit, now as an insider, that &#34;in large&#34;&#47;real world, especially when you have to use multiple monads - i.e. monad transformers, it tends to very unreadable and clumsy code.<p>posted by Zura</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634694578988072439</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 04:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634694578988072439</guid>
		<dc:creator>Zura</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634694578988072439">Zura</a>: Hi, are you from a company that uses Haskell? It would be interesting to share your outlook and opinion about the language, maybe in a blog post. It's always nice to have feedback from who uses Haskell in the &quot;Real World&quot;. Bye and Good Easter day!</p><p>posted by CharlesStain</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634694668958324278</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 07:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634694668958324278</guid>
		<dc:creator>CharlesStain</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I guess by that definition I&#39;d also qualify as an &#34;insider&#34;, and I have to say that my experience has been very different from yours. Monad transformers certainly don&#39;t solve all the world&#39;s problems, but I&#39;ve not found that they lead to unreadable or clumsy code. &#40;And it&#39;s worth pointing out that Monad transformers are just one of a whole suite of approaches to handling effects - different approaches being suitable in different situations&#41;.<p>posted by Ben</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634695576294861062</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634695576294861062</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[&#64;CharlesStain&#58; Hi. Thanks, I hope you had a good Easter day as well&#33;<br>I&#39;m not from the company that uses Haskell and I&#39;m not a blogger&#47;writer &#58;&#41;<br>I acquired this impression after fairly long time playing with Haskell. As I already expressed, it is really nice in &#34;academic&#34; use cases.<br><br>&#64;Ben&#58; Besides my personal experience, I feel the same regarding many non-trivial &#34;real world&#34; Haskell projects you can find on the net.<br><br><p>posted by Zura</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634696722301180191</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634696722301180191</guid>
		<dc:creator>Zura</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: A Means to Many Ends: 10+ Years of Haskell at Galois</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If monad stack you chose leads to unreadable&#47;clumsy code you probably chose wrong stack in the first place.<p>posted by Marek Sieradzki</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634700926441180450</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/A-Means-to-Many-Ends-10-Years-of-Haskell-at-Galois#c634700926441180450</guid>
		<dc:creator>Marek Sieradzki</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>