<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Modern programming thrives on rich spaces of data, information and services. F# 3.0 brings integrated support for Information Rich Programming to the .NET platform. F# Type Providers and F# Queries greatly simplify data-rich analytical programming, allowing programmers to easily access and manipulate a variety of data sources. In this talk, I&#39;ll introduce these exciting new features and how they can be used to leverage technologies such as OData, SQL Server, WSDL services, SharePoint, and Windows Azure Marketplace. </description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:40:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The talk was quite inspiring. I also think that stuff like that is the way to go, at least for non-performance critical apps.<br><br>But I think the very first comparison with C&#35; was a real bad choice &#94;&#94;. You may fool the noobs but with a crowd like that, I am sure I am not the only who noticed that your C&#35; boilerplate was contrived. The five lines of F&#35; for the command pattern translate almost without any additional characters to their C&#35; equivalent, at least if you use C&#35;4 and don&#39;t restrict yourself to C&#35;2. BTW, the F&#35; code shown there does NOT the same, it does a lot less... Not that I am not convinced that in F&#35; one can write some stuff more compact and concise but trying to fool the audience usually leaves a bad impression. Instead find a better example and I bet there are plenty&#33;<p>posted by Luna</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634694272691738288</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634694272691738288</guid>
		<dc:creator>Luna</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>The F# information rich programming concept was kind of an eye opener for me. It makes a lot of sense to strongly type external data sources in this way. I find it very interesting to watch where F# is going, even though I don't use it myself.</p><p>I also want to &#43;1 Luna's comment about the contrived C# code. A dishonest comparison like this is far from the best way to win over new developers. I'm sure you can do better.</p><p>posted by Trillian</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634695340923216409</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 02:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634695340923216409</guid>
		<dc:creator>Trillian</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>i enjoyed this talk and being kinda new to programming. &nbsp;I really like the .NET platform although I never use VB. &nbsp;I look forward to win8 and seeing the new languages that will come the winRT. &nbsp;my blog&nbsp;<a href="http://williamsadventures.wordpress.com/category/intro/">http://williamsadventures.wordpress.com/category/intro/</a>. &nbsp;See u around the bends friends.</p><p>posted by tertl3</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634695899735774518</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634695899735774518</guid>
		<dc:creator>tertl3</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>While I enjoyed the talk,&nbsp;I got disappointed that the future of F# part did not address the 2nd class status that F# seems currently to enjoy in Visual Studio.</p><p>I for one would like to have proper F# support for Web development, WP and Windows 8 in Visual Studio.</p><p>posted by Moondevil</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634701000864287067</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634701000864287067</guid>
		<dc:creator>Moondevil</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>@Luna--good point. I should probably have said OO style with C#, rather than just C#. You're right that if I used lambdas in C#, it would have been much more succint. Generally, the OO-style command pattern seems very prevalent, possibly because the language in general is very object-oriented.</p><p>posted by DonnaMalayeri</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634703725250837810</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634703725250837810</guid>
		<dc:creator>DonnaMalayeri</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Information Rich Programming with F# 3.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>This is pretty cool. I'm wondering if the type provider feature will eventually carry over to C# as well. I wonder what that would mean for something like Entity Framework.</p><p>posted by jemiller</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634704655041508491</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Information-Rich-Programming-with-F-3-0#c634704655041508491</guid>
		<dc:creator>jemiller</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>