<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - John Cook: Why and How People Use R</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Why-and-How-People-Use-R/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>R is a strange, deeply flawed language that nevertheless has an enthusiastic and rapidly growing user base. What about R accounts for its popularity in its niche? What can language designers learn from R&#39;s success? </description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:58:42 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:58:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: John Cook: Why and How People Use R</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>Great talk!</p><p>By popular demand I have some experience teaching R to novices.&nbsp;Being a mathematician with&nbsp;a fair amount&nbsp;of computer science experience,&nbsp;I always found myself rather uncomfortable teaching these R workshops and courses. In particular, students that know how&nbsp;to program in&nbsp;e.g. C&#43;&#43;, C#&nbsp;or&nbsp;Java, find themselves totally&nbsp;lost by&nbsp;its peculiarities (or maybe even misconceptions???).&nbsp;</p><p>John really nails the issues in this talk. Honestly, I was somewhat sceptical seeing a talk on R in the Lang.Next conference, but I totally subscribe to John's point of view here. Statisticians love R, I do not... In particular lack of decent tools is unbearable once you are used to IDEs like Visual Studio 2010. Indeed there is quite some room for designing a suitable and reliable&nbsp;DSL for statistics and the proper tools that go with it! Maybe call it Q#&#43;&#43;?</p><p>posted by aweeren</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Why-and-How-People-Use-R#c634709067785072721</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Why-and-How-People-Use-R#c634709067785072721</guid>
		<dc:creator>aweeren</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: John Cook: Why and How People Use R</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<p>I am a C# .net programmer. Did Java and Python in the past as well. I absolutely loved R for what it could do and in fact it replaced a lot of my Excel/SQL use.</p><p>If you can think in terms of vectors, R is a breeze to learn and use. The main issue is that people try to label R as this or that (object-oriented, functional, scripting, 'like scheme', etc). Instead if you stop trying to label it and just learn the way it works, you can do some incredible stuff with it.</p><p>posted by Space_Cow</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Why-and-How-People-Use-R#c634709099142006826</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:18:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Why-and-How-People-Use-R#c634709099142006826</guid>
		<dc:creator>Space_Cow</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>