http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,2180,1938275,00.asp
Microsoft's Engineering Excellence unit, headed by 20-year company veteran Jon DeVaan, is overseeing a project to reengineer the way software is developed inside Microsoft. DeVaan, a member of Microsoft's central Business Leadership Team,
manages the engineering standards used to create Microsoft's software products
-
-
Way to misread the article.
They're talking about frequent beta/CTP builds, which apparently are only a feature of open source (way to miss the whole agile "movement" there Mary)
However holding up VS2005 and SQL2005 as successes for the CTP process might annoy a few people who are not happy with the quality of those poducts. Not to mention the missing features. -
I have a feeling that the lack of Avalon and Indigo builds for post-Beta 2 versions of .NET Framework 2.0 actually kept most people from testing the release candidates of VS and SQL Server 2005. It certainly stopped me from testing them - to the limited extent I was testing them.
Anyone else? -
Yesterday I was seeing "Microsoft moves to open source" titles degenerated from this story. It's incredible what people understand or want to understand from a story simple as this. Here's the accurate story: http://www.redmondtimes.com/news/12/Microsoft-may-give-up-beta-versioning
Basically they are giving up beta versions of the software in favor of frequent previews. Which I believe is a very good change. -
Does Mary Jo Foley need another spanking?

blowdart wrote:
They're talking about frequent beta/CTP builds, which apparently are only a feature of open source (way to miss the whole agile "movement" there Mary)
-
rjdohnert wrote:Does Mary Jo Foley need another spanking?

You know all she'll do is cut and paste something from this thread as a new "news article"

Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.