Sigh...
Let's give this a little perspective. There are Palestinians who fire rockets (with no guidance) into an Israeli city (Sderot). Here's the thing, the IDF doesn't want to go in on the ground, that would cause much more havoc, and the PA doesn't police them,
so the IDF has to resort to air strikes. Unfortunately, they sometimes miss, but you will note that they aren't deliberately targeting civilians, unlike the Palestinian terrorists. Also, keep in mind that a lot of these rocket attacks occur from the steets,
people backyards, sometimes from buildings. Unfortunately, it puts Israel inbetween a rock and hard place.
So, lets see... how about this scenario... a group of people start shooting rockets into Vancouver from Seattle. The US decides that they don't mind, because the elected leaders all say that Canada shouldn't have the right to exist and death to all Canadians,
so they don't even bother policing the terrorist Seattlites. What should Canada do? p.s. the UN says that you shouldn't retaliate, and the world doesn't cover any stories about the missile strikes. Oh yeah, Mexico, the UK, France, Russia and China all hate
you too, and are funding the operations and sending missiles into Seattle to help the cause.
What bothers me the most is the duality of the reactions to each side. How many top news stories have you seen about the town of Sderot and the daily missile attacks? No, instead it is about how Israel is a big bully for actually trying to defend one of their
cities from the daily attacks.
Granted, the rocket attacks haven't killed too many people to date (15 I think), but it has injured quite a few, and the daily threat has to wear on you.
How about this, how would you feel if Israel dropped their plan of targetted attacks on PA terrorists, and instead lobbed missiles into towns in Gaza (note: the missiles don't do as much killing, but they aren't targetted and commonly hit things such as school
buildings)?
As far as the beach artillery shell thing, I still think that one is up in the air. The last I heard was that the IDF ruled out it being one of their shells based on tests from shrapnel in the wounded. There were some concerns about one of the wounded who came
in to the Israeli hospital with all traces of shrapnel removed (even without it being medically necessary, which isn't normally done), which seems suspicious. Lastly, the Human Rights Watch folks are conceding that it might have been unexploded ordinance from
a previous shelling, in which case I have to wonder why people would have been out on the beach there with their children in the first place.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.