Another_Darren wrote:

Rotem Kirshenbaum wrote: 
Rossj wrote: Apparently this is a hoax. I hate to think how much dev time this might have wasted, and can imagine how upset a corporate might be if someone pulled this one and they wasted hours or days looking for a bug that was already known about.


Hoax or not, it doesn't mean that the implementation of JavaScript in FF is not almost impossible to patch.

Rotem


Wow, you laid it out with all the facts...  "doesn't mean", "not almost"


I'm not saying that it's a fact.
Let me explain: "A is true and B is true". Just because A isn't true doesn't mean the B is false also Smiley

Heck, I don't know if the JS implementation in Mozilla is a mess or not. If t's really a 10-year old code, than it probably is. Or maybe it's not (tautology rocks ! Tongue Out ).

Rotem