I got 4.2 point in Windows Vista. And you.
The highest point in Windows Vista is 5.0? Right?
-
Follow
Oops, something didn't work.
Sign In to be begin to follow this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.Getting "follow" information
Start following this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.Removing your "follow"
Setting up your "follow"
Did you know you can
sign up for email notifications?
-
-
littleguru
<3 Seattle
I have a 4.0. That is only because of my CPU. For all the other pieces that are measured I get between 4.4 and 5.9!
The highest point is 6, but they are going to extend it to 7 in RTM. -
littleguru wrote:I have a 4.0. That is only because of my CPU. For all the other pieces that are measured I get between 4.4 and 5.9!
The highest point is 6, but they are going to extend it to 7 in RTM.
7 point in RTM. What are they going to do? Can't imagine!
Vista is really really a long-wait OS in Microsoft history. -
W3bbo
Work hard; increase production; prevent accidents, and be happy.
Mikyt wrote:7 point in RTM. What are they going to do? Can't imagine!
Intel Quadcore, Dual-SLI nVidia GeForce 8950GTX 4GB-GDDR4, 16GB DDR3 RAM, 1.5TB RAID-0, HD-DVD.
I can see that being the "high-end" norm within a year.
-
Sven Groot
Don't worry... I'm a doctor.
Mine's a 3.7, just like littleguru it's the CPU that's dragging it down.
My laptop gets 1.0, there's it's the video card that's responsible for the low score.
-
littleguru
<3 Seattle
I don't understand why MS didn't make it an open system with no highest score... I mean 1.0 for a computer that runs vista basic. Like other benchmarks do: In 10 years we have then scores around 1000 points or so.
-
DCMonkey
What?!?
Component Details Subscore Base score Processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz 3.4 3.4 Determined by lowest subscore Memory (RAM) 1.00 GB 4.5 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM) 5.9 Gaming graphics 767 MB Total available graphics memory 4.3 Primary hard disk 51GB Free (76GB Total) 5.1 Windows Vista (TM) Ultimate
I had a FX5200 in my Vista machine that was rated 2.6. It was a bit sluggish but usable for day-to-day tasks. But WPF performance was horrible.
The new 7600 makes a big difference, but I'm still a bit worried about the WPF performance.
-
dahat
inanity makes my head hurt
When I tried it on my primary desktop for a time I got a 1.9... solely because my main HD only had about 15 gigs free... which is kind of odd considering I had about 100 gigs free on the other HD’s in the system.
-
jamie
Niner since 2004
-
Jason Cox
Longtime C9 Lurker
littleguru wrote:I don't understand why MS didn't make it an open system with no highest score... I mean 1.0 for a computer that runs vista basic. Like other benchmarks do: In 10 years we have then scores around 1000 points or so.
No you wont, they'll probaly have it change over time so a PC that was rated, lets say 4.0 now, will be rated at 2.0 or 2.5 in a few years. -
TommyCarlier
Widen your gaze
Is there a similar tool for XP? One that tells you how well Vista will run on your PC?
-
My notebook Acer Travelmate 8204WLMi
-
Jason Cox wrote:
No you wont, they'll probaly have it change over time so a PC that was rated, lets say 4.0 now, will be rated at 2.0 or 2.5 in a few years.
I seem to recall a PDC talk (possibly Raymond Chen's) that stated this was not the case. The values will simply increase over time, otherwise vendors would have to re-label their packages periodically. -
mVPstar
I'm white because I smelt an onion.
jamie wrote:
I get that too.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.