<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 Forums - Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:11:45 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>9</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>-9</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>-1</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, the RAID 10 of our domain server failed again...... two harddisk of the same mirror failed at the same time without and alert emails ever sent.<br>
<br>
I'm enough the those unreliable Promise RAID cards, and Adaptec cards are not good either. Can anyone recommand any RAID cards I can trust for?<br>
<br>
Errata: My staffs told me that it should be Adaptec 2130S. So the current scoreboard should be 3 fails for Promise vs 3 fails for Adaptec...<br>
(all within this 2 years)<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/249839#249839</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/249839#249839</guid>
		<dc:creator>cheong</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/cheong/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>cheong wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;Today, the RAID 10 of our domain server failed again...... two harddisk of the same mirror failed at the same time without and alert emails ever sent.<br>
<br>
I'm enough the those unreliable Promise RAID cards, and Adaptec cards are not good either. Can anyone recommand any RAID cards I can trust for?<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Mylex used to be the only 3rd party RAID controller that I really had faith in (IBM and HP/Compaq raid controllers owed much to mylex) but since IBM offloaded Mylex to LSI Logic... I don't know what the score is.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/9980b51b815349f6a0349dec003206a7#9980b51b815349f6a0349dec003206a7</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/9980b51b815349f6a0349dec003206a7#9980b51b815349f6a0349dec003206a7</guid>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MB/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>cheong wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;Today, the RAID 10 of our domain server failed again...... two harddisk of the same mirror failed at the same time without and alert emails ever sent.<br>
<br>
I'm enough the those unreliable Promise RAID cards, and Adaptec cards are not good either. Can anyone recommand any RAID cards I can trust for?<br>
<br>
Errata: My staffs told me that it should be Adaptec 2130S. So the current scoreboard should be 3 fails for Promise vs 3 fails for Adaptec...<br>
(all within this 2 years)<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Uh ? <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-7.gif' alt='Perplexed' /><br>
<br>
which is it the drives or the controller cards ??<br>
<br>
whats the working environment ?? <br>
Data center ?<br>
<br>
are they on UPS power ?<br>
<br>
temp control ?<br>
<br>
brand and models of drives ?<br>
<br>
<br>
I have setup arrays that run for 2-3 years with parhaps 1 or 2 drive losses but never 2 at the same time....<br>
<br>
<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/8816706cb5ff4f76b1279dec003206d8#8816706cb5ff4f76b1279dec003206d8</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:03:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/8816706cb5ff4f76b1279dec003206d8#8816706cb5ff4f76b1279dec003206d8</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/figuerres/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>figuerres wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;<br>
Uh ? <img src="/emoticons/emotion-7.gif" border="0"><br>
<br>
which is it the drives or the controller cards ??<br>
<br>
whats the working environment ?? <br>
Data center ?<br>
<br>
are they on UPS power ?<br>
<br>
temp control ?<br>
<br>
brand and models of drives ?<br>
<br>
<br>
I have setup arrays that run for 2-3 years with parhaps 1 or 2 drive losses but never 2 at the same time....<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
For the record:<br>
<br>
It is 4 identical Seagate 73GB SCSI HDD(ST373207LW) forming RAID 10 on a Adaptec 2130S controller.<br>
<br>
A system check reveiled the Drive1 failed, and the Drive0 is in fact ok.<br>
<br>
The server was located in a server rack inside our company's office, with 24hrs air-conditioning and UPS attached.<br>
<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/89e66239cf0a47f49e319dec00320709#89e66239cf0a47f49e319dec00320709</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/89e66239cf0a47f49e319dec00320709#89e66239cf0a47f49e319dec00320709</guid>
		<dc:creator>cheong</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/cheong/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok so then how is this the card's fault?<br>
<br>
a drive going down is out of the control of the card...<br>
<br>
unless the card somehow killed a drive.<br>
<br>
or perhaps you are just frustrated and venting a bit ?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/05437d9105a14a4f84d89dec00320738#05437d9105a14a4f84d89dec00320738</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/05437d9105a14a4f84d89dec00320738#05437d9105a14a4f84d89dec00320738</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/figuerres/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess it could be certain bug on the card that fails the RAID when the faulty drive goes down... or perheps its not a bug.<br>
<br>
If the faulty drive fails when the RAID card tries to read from it and sync it to the other drive, I can somehow understand......<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/c58aed0c20424021a6209dec00320766#c58aed0c20424021a6209dec00320766</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:57:25 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/c58aed0c20424021a6209dec00320766#c58aed0c20424021a6209dec00320766</guid>
		<dc:creator>cheong</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/cheong/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm... so a mirror broke and that cause the card's firmware / software to halt the array?<br>
<br>
I guess this is part of why 5's are so common....<br>
<br>
with a 3&#43; raid 5 with hot-spares the system just rebuilds and marks the bad drive....<br>
<br>
but with stripe &#43; mirror it's a bit more dicy.....<br>
<br>
or do I have that backwards ....<br>
<br>
mirror &#43; stripe ??<br>
<br>
<br>
if we have drives like this:<br>
<br>
<br>
1,2,3&nbsp;&nbsp; stripe as drive 0<br>
4,5,6&nbsp;&nbsp; stripe as drive 1<br>
<br>
0,1 mirror as &quot;BIG DISK&quot;<br>
<br>
if any one of drives 1,6 fail then the mirror has faulted and you are at risk.<br>
<br>
<br>
been a while since I last mucked with the 1,0 or 0,1 raid modes...<br>
<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/bc261a9eb5ab4bbfaa7e9dec00320797#bc261a9eb5ab4bbfaa7e9dec00320797</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/bc261a9eb5ab4bbfaa7e9dec00320797#bc261a9eb5ab4bbfaa7e9dec00320797</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/figuerres/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Status update: After 6 hours of rescue, I successfully recovered the system.<br>
<br>
It's time to fix those EDB errors and rebuild the RAID (I only managed to dump the partitions to another set of harddisks), but that's the work of my fellow staffs.<br>
<br>
It's 00:32am here and I'm going home now... bye. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-5.gif' alt='Wink' /><br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/e1cb82ec4d754cb183909dec003207c5#e1cb82ec4d754cb183909dec003207c5</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/e1cb82ec4d754cb183909dec003207c5#e1cb82ec4d754cb183909dec003207c5</guid>
		<dc:creator>cheong</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/cheong/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - RAID failed again</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've been running a SCSI RAID 10 on an Adaptec&nbsp;PCI card under Win2K for about 5 years. I've lost two different Seagate SCSI drives, but the hot spare always worked, and I've never lost any data.<br>
<br>
Of course, the e-mail notification never worked...&nbsp; I had to see the light on the array for one, and the other via a pop-up message when I logged onto the server remotely...</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/b7c5343ef2614f2fa70b9dec003207f4#b7c5343ef2614f2fa70b9dec003207f4</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:35:59 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/249839-RAID-failed-again/b7c5343ef2614f2fa70b9dec003207f4#b7c5343ef2614f2fa70b9dec003207f4</guid>
		<dc:creator>Steven J Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Steven J Ackerman/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>