<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 Forums - Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:09:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>17</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>-17</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>-1</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><br>
&nbsp;I typically keep mine reasonably small and discrete - typically doing as little as possible, but I've encountered some monster sprocs in my time which seem to be all out of keeping with the actual db model and the size of the project.<br>
<br>
Tonight a friend told me that a team at his place had built a 250-odd line sproc for a project that I thought would be much smaller.<br>
<br>
&nbsp;So - how big are your sprocs? Do you worry about putting too much logic in your database? Why do you make them the size they are (because it is a complex project isn't a good answer)?<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/252528#252528</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/252528#252528</guid>
		<dc:creator>Rossj</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Rossj/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I typically use sprocs only to avoid putting actual SQL in my C#/VB/whatever code, and I keep them as small as possible. They tend to be single select/update/insert/delete statements, and if an insert they're usually followed by select scope_identity.
 But that's about all. All my logic is in other places.<br>
<br>
If I need more code on the database level it's usually in triggers and check constraints, not stored procedures.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/5de67006e600423db97d9dec005bd235#5de67006e600423db97d9dec005bd235</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/5de67006e600423db97d9dec005bd235#5de67006e600423db97d9dec005bd235</guid>
		<dc:creator>Sven Groot</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Sven Groot/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>Sven Groot wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;I typically use sprocs only to avoid putting actual SQL in my C#/VB/whatever code, and I keep them as small as possible. They tend to be single select/update/insert/delete statements, and if an insert they're usually followed by select scope_identity.
 But that's about all. All my logic is in other places.<br>
<br>
If I need more code on the database level it's usually in triggers and check constraints, not stored procedures.</div>
</blockquote>
me too<br>
<br>
usually 10-15 lines</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/8704eb89aa8148b594549dec005bd25e#8704eb89aa8148b594549dec005bd25e</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/8704eb89aa8148b594549dec005bd25e#8704eb89aa8148b594549dec005bd25e</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ion Todirel</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Ion Todirel/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't know how big the sproc is but it has an 870 lines(&#43;-) select query. It joins data from around 50 tables doing multiple agregates and uses variuouse functions. It basicaly does statistics on a conected graph with tens of thousants of lines at the
 largest level. It also has some comments and not all lines are sql statements. No temporary tables are used in the query.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/0a416320a6fc47eea87b9dec005bd287#0a416320a6fc47eea87b9dec005bd287</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/0a416320a6fc47eea87b9dec005bd287#0a416320a6fc47eea87b9dec005bd287</guid>
		<dc:creator>Pop Catalin</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Pop Catalin Sever/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Depends on the client and their systems. The largest have been where they were pulling a lot of data from the 400. It seems that sprocs that pull data for proposals are always the largest.<br>
<br>
In a perfect world I would like to keep my sprocs slim and trim. I would rather a client update a rule in an IDE then a sproc.<br>
<br>
<br>
<em>Do you worry about putting too much logic in your database?</em> <br>
<br>
No because sometimes when pulling data from other systems you dont want to add logic to your application that does not belong (I guess this is more of a design preference)&nbsp;
<br>
<br>
<em>Why do you make them the size they are (because it is a complex project isn't a good answer)?<br>
<br>
</em>Because the calling application may not be able to manipulate the data. Also to keep bad table design join complexity in the sproc instead of branching out into the enterprise apps.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/1befcc349bd243bcbd739dec005bd2b0#1befcc349bd243bcbd739dec005bd2b0</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/1befcc349bd243bcbd739dec005bd2b0#1befcc349bd243bcbd739dec005bd2b0</guid>
		<dc:creator>harumscarum</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/harumscarum/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Size does not matter.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/a86efd3c619243929f1f9dec005bd2d7#a86efd3c619243929f1f9dec005bd2d7</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/a86efd3c619243929f1f9dec005bd2d7#a86efd3c619243929f1f9dec005bd2d7</guid>
		<dc:creator>SecretSoftware</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/SecretSoftware/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>Rossj wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;<br>
&nbsp;So - how big are your sprocs? Do you worry about putting too much logic in your database? Why do you make them the size they are (because it is a complex project isn't a good answer)?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Now, we have projects (two) on .net2k3 (c#, web app) with crystal reports. Here the role of the SP is to fetch the data from more than 11 tables and put it in one #table and use it in CR as reports data (huge) and no.of SP lines goes to nearly between 1000
 line to 1250. We have such reports 3.nos. And other SPs are all small 50 to 150 lines.<br>
<br>
Well that&nbsp;is nothing.... In 1999, we had a project on vb6.0 and sql-6.5 (windows app, client-server), where SP lines goes to 2K to 2.5K and we had nearly some 450 procedures (only some were small).<br>
<br>
Because, size is not the fact to keep in mind. If 10 programmes, 10 diff ways. So the ultimate is to get the output as desired that serves our purpose. And there is no other great way other than this (as i see). I can't open some 100s of recordsets and hold
 the data and put into the grid in front-end <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /> <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-2.gif' alt='Big Smile' />. SQL statements need to be very very long, with all joins and stuff (which really helps in reducing the lines in SP)<br>
<br>
And to all these, we need to add comments [C] to the lines so understand whats happening. So SP lines really increase more.&nbsp;Finally we break the SP into parts to 2 or 3 max and call them in one SP. This really helps in debugging or any later modifications.
<br>
<br>
Phew!</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/fe5a0803aa5b4e49acb09dec005bd304#fe5a0803aa5b4e49acb09dec005bd304</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/fe5a0803aa5b4e49acb09dec005bd304#fe5a0803aa5b4e49acb09dec005bd304</guid>
		<dc:creator>Raghu</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Raghavendra_Mudugal/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I definitely try to keep my sprocs simple and generally logic free. The only time I would have a sproc get over just a couple lines of code is if I had some logic that needed to be ran that would take substantially longer to run outside of a database.
 I really don't even like having to do that, but in the end performance beats design.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/bc58a2d31f7d4c2e87aa9dec005bd32c#bc58a2d31f7d4c2e87aa9dec005bd32c</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:39:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/bc58a2d31f7d4c2e87aa9dec005bd32c#bc58a2d31f7d4c2e87aa9dec005bd32c</guid>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Carter</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LostInTangent/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>LostInTangent wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;I definitely try to keep my sprocs simple and generally logic free. The only time I would have a sproc get over just a couple lines of code is if I had some logic that needed to be ran that would take substantially longer to run outside of a database.
 I really don't even like having to do that, but in the end performance beats design.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Bingo!&nbsp; This is what we do too.&nbsp; 90% of our SPs are small and contain no logic, but sometimes the DB can do it a lot faster and we break the purity for that reason.&nbsp; Also, some of our SPs that do paging with lots of weird conditional sorting get kind of long
 (200-300 lines), but there are only 5 to 10 of those.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/0a1e89a565f6462bb6bd9dec005bd356#0a1e89a565f6462bb6bd9dec005bd356</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/0a1e89a565f6462bb6bd9dec005bd356#0a1e89a565f6462bb6bd9dec005bd356</guid>
		<dc:creator>Erik Porter</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/HumanCompiler/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I try and keep mine small, but have seen some truly horrendous ones in my time that nobody seems to actually understand.<br>
<br>
But this is really a performance vs scalability question. You are pushing scalability but there are times where scalability isn't needed but performance is, and putting all the logic into a stored proc that gets called once rather than artificially using multiple
 stored proc invocations can make for much better performance.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/fcb2f1f611c34613bdd89dec005bd37f#fcb2f1f611c34613bdd89dec005bd37f</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/fcb2f1f611c34613bdd89dec005bd37f#fcb2f1f611c34613bdd89dec005bd37f</guid>
		<dc:creator>irascian</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/irascian/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I worked on a sql server 6.5 database for a large charity donation system which had 1500 sprocs with the avergage line count being about 500 lines, some were in excess of a 1000 lines long.<br>
<br>
And I had to go through and convert these old procs to be sql server 2000 compliant (no compatibility mode).<br>
<br>
<img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-6.gif' alt='Sad' /><br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/5a300cfa4bba4485b2809dec005bd3a6#5a300cfa4bba4485b2809dec005bd3a6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:09:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/5a300cfa4bba4485b2809dec005bd3a6#5a300cfa4bba4485b2809dec005bd3a6</guid>
		<dc:creator>Lee Dale</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/leeappdalecom/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>irascian wrote:</div>
<div>putting all the logic into a stored proc that gets called once rather than artificially using multiple stored proc invocations can make for much better performance.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I do try to avoid multiple sproc calls for what is logically a single operation.<br>
<br>
What I willt typically do is chain my stored procedures. Let's say I have a Customer table and an Order table. If I want to be able to get a single customer and all its orders (where I don't want to use a join since I don't need all the customer's information
 on every row), I'd have a GetOrdersForCustomer sproc, and a GetCustomer sproc that would first select the customer and then run &quot;exec GetOrdersForCustomer @id&quot;.<br>
<br>
Then the DAL may figure out how to put those two results sets together. But both results are returned from a single call to the DB.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/bcdaefdbe0b44cfdae559dec005bd3d1#bcdaefdbe0b44cfdae559dec005bd3d1</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/bcdaefdbe0b44cfdae559dec005bd3d1#bcdaefdbe0b44cfdae559dec005bd3d1</guid>
		<dc:creator>Sven Groot</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Sven Groot/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The current project I am working on has some monsterous sprocs. Theres one with aroudn 750 lines I never want to touch again.</p>
<p>A fair amount of business logic was in them before I even began, and as time has gone on that has only got worse. They are a pain to debug and a bigger pain to alter. I would love to refactor all the logic out of them but pressure to add new functionality
 means there simply is not the time. Classic example of why it should be done right from the start.
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/cf6f4494f31744beb8e69dec005bd3f9#cf6f4494f31744beb8e69dec005bd3f9</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/cf6f4494f31744beb8e69dec005bd3f9#cf6f4494f31744beb8e69dec005bd3f9</guid>
		<dc:creator>Tensor</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Tensor/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The biggest I usuaully have is for Junction table with subtyping info: like if you&nbsp; had a article with a file and you want to mark a file as the primary file for that article. (so if the file is used in more than one article for different purposes it would
 be repurposed by all articles)<br>
<br>
So I would do a ArticleFile_Save proc:<br>
<br>
Declare @ID&nbsp; as Varchar(20)<br>
SELECT @ID =exec ArticleFile_ReadID @ArticleID, @FileID)<br>
IF(@ID is NULL)<br>
BEGIN<br>
SELECT @ID = exec ArticleFile_Insert @ArticleID, @FileID, @Primary, @Type<br>
END<br>
ELSE<br>
BEGIN<br>
&nbsp;exec ArticleFile_Update @ArticleID, @FileID, @Primary, @Type<br>
END<br>
<br>
SELECT @ID<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Add transaction block and the Alter proc statement&nbsp; and parameter&nbsp; declarations and thats as long as they get.<br>
<br>
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/53998d9e04734f96bc279dec005bd423#53998d9e04734f96bc279dec005bd423</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/53998d9e04734f96bc279dec005bd423#53998d9e04734f96bc279dec005bd423</guid>
		<dc:creator>odujosh</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/odujosh/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An interesting question, no doubt. I <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/danielfe/archive/2005/07/10/437312.aspx">
blogged about this</a> a while back as I created a simple Windows Forms application that inspects your database and enables searching the contents of stored procedures as well as&nbsp;summuary data for all your&nbsp;stored procedures.<br>
<br>
- 63 stored procedures<br>
- 2,100 lines of code<br>
- 33 lines of code on average <br>
<br>
It's not super smart in that it counts white space as I believe I still count blank lines as lines, but you get the general idea.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.danfernandez.com/view/view.aspx?ID=159">Download Exe</a>&nbsp;|| <a href="http://www.danfernandez.com/view/view.aspx?ID=160">
Download Source</a><br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
-Dan<br>
<br>
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/bccf5c00af13482186149dec005bd44d#bccf5c00af13482186149dec005bd44d</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/bccf5c00af13482186149dec005bd44d#bccf5c00af13482186149dec005bd44d</guid>
		<dc:creator>Dan Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dan/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Being in financials, our book and tax system sprocs tend to be fairly large. (about 300 - 600 lines on average).<br>
<br>
We keep all related logic wrapped in Sql Functions that are consumed by the sprocs.<br>
<br>
I guess it depends on what the application is...<br>
<br>
Different apps have different levels of data and procedure requirements.<br>
<br>
Also, consider the extra lines that OpenXML and SqlXMl require...<br>
<br>
Is anyone else even really using OpenXML ?<br>
<br>
I love it, but I don't find many resources or marketing behind it.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/4ab48896e7ff4454ac839dec005bd475#4ab48896e7ff4454ac839dec005bd475</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/4ab48896e7ff4454ac839dec005bd475#4ab48896e7ff4454ac839dec005bd475</guid>
		<dc:creator>phreaks</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/phreaks/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - How big are your sprocs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>Dan wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;as I created a simple Windows Forms application that inspects your database and enables searching the contents of stored procedures as well as&nbsp;summuary data for all your&nbsp;stored procedures.</div>
</blockquote>
nice UI <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-5.gif' alt='Wink' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/0a3c4c78a5724188899c9dec005bd49d#0a3c4c78a5724188899c9dec005bd49d</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/252528-How-big-are-your-sprocs/0a3c4c78a5724188899c9dec005bd49d#0a3c4c78a5724188899c9dec005bd49d</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ion Todirel</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Ion Todirel/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>