Media Bias or Just The Gore Party Line

Morning TV’s One-Sided Climate Crusade

Study: ABC, CBS and NBC Push Global Warming Alarmism, Purge Skeptics and Hide Economic Costs

"...MRC analysts examined all 115 news stories that dealt with global warming from January 1 through April 15 on NBC’s Today, ABC’s Good Morning America and CBS’s The Early Show. These morning news programs had a combined audience of more than 13 million during the first three months of 2007. Unlike the networks’ evening newscasts, the two- and three-hour morning shows have longer segments that should (in theory) make it easier to include multiple points of view on controversial topics. But MRC’s analysts found just four stories out of 115 (just over 3%) contained any mention of dissent from Gore’s approach to global warming — and even those stories were heavily stacked in favor of his "climate crisis" position..."


http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/2007/fax20070419-1.asp




PS I am  waiting for George Carlin's take on this, since he is a Sun worshipper.

George Carlin on religion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uBAPbOWLxc

George is probably praying to Joe Pesci to save us from global warming & Al Gore.

Joe Pesci gets things done.

May be George Carlin has already spoken on the subject:


     I think global waming is a big lie.

    Where are all those experts now, when I am freezing my a*s through a long winter?


http://www.ajokes.com/jokes/436.html

Investigative reporter jason jones already has investigated those alternative options
http://www.ifilm.com/video/2846599 

anand.t wrote:

Investigative reporter jason jones already has investigated those alternative options
http://www.ifilm.com/video/2846599 

In the video a government school "science teacher" can only find one old Newsweek article on other opinions regarding global warming. 

Must have been on global cooling in the 1970s.

It was!
 
No wonder the  7th grade "science teacher" would not use it in your class:

The Cooling World Newsweek, April 28, 1975

"...The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic.
 
“A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,” warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, “because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.”

http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

What search engine was the teacher using?

Try this and see what you find on Google and Live:

opposing views on global warming climate change 

The video had its moments, but this is more like it for the  children:

Al Gore's Travelin' Global Warming Show

http://www.pollyticks.com/item/2522

I will wait for the George Carlin video on global warming on YouTube.

George is a great BS detector.  He drives many people nuts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit

Do not forgot that global warming is a moral and religious issue!

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=1596207

http://evangelicalclimateinitiative.org/

The Reverand  Al Gore dropped out of both Vanderbilt Divinity School and Law School (kept on getting F's):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverend

http://www.larryelder.com/Gore/goredubiousrecord.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A37397-2000Mar18

Instead of pursuing a degree, he went into politics and he is still running.

I think Al Gore will become this century's Democrat version of Harold Stassen!


"...Stassen was later best known for being a perennial candidate for the Republican Party nomination for President, seeking it nine times between 1948 and 1992 (1948, 1952, 1964, 1968, 1976, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992) but never winning it or, after 1952, even coming close..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Stassen

Presenting an opposing view is not the same as being unbiased. 

If I say the sky is blue, you can probably find some nutjob that will disagree.  Should his point of view be expressed in a news story about the color of the sky? 

And George Carlin is a comedian, not a climate change scientist.

He makes me laugh, but if I had a brain tumor and he found some witty insight into the surgical process involved with removing that tumor, I'd laugh.  But I'd still go to the doctor.

We now return you to your regular, upright position.  Please place your tray tables up and put the tinfoil hat back on.

Edit: I can't spell

Looks like The Reverend Al Gore is running:

Gore campaign team assembles in secret

By Tim Shipman in Washington, Sunday Telegraph

"Friends of Al Gore have secretly started assembling a campaign team in preparation for the former American vice-president to make a fresh bid for the White House..."


"...Vice-President Gore's allies believe that Hillary Clinton, 59, the frontrunner, is unable to win the presidency. The most recent poll shows a growing number of voters think negatively of her, in contrast to Mr Gore, who enjoys far greater popularity than when he lost the 2000 presidential race despite polling more votes nationally than the eventual winner, George W Bush..."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/22/wgore22.xml

Well Richard Nixon won on the second try.

Actualy he won on the first try, but did not contest the election results in Texas and in Illinois. He should have.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_1960

Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (1/5)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr5O1HsTVgA&mode=related&search=

http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics 

Below is a complete listing of the articles in "How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic," a series by Coby Beck containing responses to the most common skeptical arguments on global warming. There are four separate taxonomies; arguments are divided by: Stages of Denial, Scientific Topics, Types of Argument, and Levels of Sophistication.