<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 Forums - Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:47:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>17</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>-17</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>-1</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know there is a port on these forums suggesting that it's a good idea - but no-one has said &quot;Yeah, it's coming soon!&quot;<br>
<br>
I love channel 9, and would like to see the site spiffed up with a silverlight overhaul. It would make the whole site so much more engaging and allow for many new features (even if&nbsp;I can't think of one right now...).<br>
<br>
Yes - I know it doesn't support Linux, but there could be a 'simple site' for Linux&nbsp;users, or a &quot;Click here to download the video&quot; option for those that can't run Silverlight.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/254904#254904</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:01:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/254904#254904</guid>
		<dc:creator>intrepid</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/intrepid/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>someone from the team said &quot;it is obvious&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/0f5b3c99f0ae41ab9cfa9dec007d94eb#0f5b3c99f0ae41ab9cfa9dec007d94eb</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/0f5b3c99f0ae41ab9cfa9dec007d94eb#0f5b3c99f0ae41ab9cfa9dec007d94eb</guid>
		<dc:creator>anand.t</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/anand.t/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">intrepid wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;but there could be a 'simple site' for Linux&nbsp;users</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
How strangely poetic ... <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<br>
But there is some kind of Silverlight clone being developed by the Mono chap. If he does a good job, then it may not be such a big problem for them.<br>
<br>
<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/3a16958d0d544ebc898c9dec007d9518#3a16958d0d544ebc898c9dec007d9518</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/3a16958d0d544ebc898c9dec007d9518#3a16958d0d544ebc898c9dec007d9518</guid>
		<dc:creator>Ray6</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Ray6/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">intrepid wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody"><br>
I love channel 9, and would like to see the site spiffed up with a silverlight overhaul. It would make the whole site so much more engaging and allow for many new features (even if&nbsp;I can't think of one right now...).</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
How would bloat and pretty spinners make the site more engaging?<br>
<br>
And the fact that you can't think of new feature is rather telling.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/f85e5d8a271b4eb896419dec007d9543#f85e5d8a271b4eb896419dec007d9543</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/f85e5d8a271b4eb896419dec007d9543#f85e5d8a271b4eb896419dec007d9543</guid>
		<dc:creator>blowdart</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/blowdart/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">blowdart wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>intrepid wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i><br>
I love channel 9, and would like to see the site spiffed up with a silverlight overhaul. It would make the whole site so much more engaging and allow for many new features (even if&nbsp;I can't think of one right now...).</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
How would bloat and pretty spinners make the site more engaging?<br>
<br>
And the fact that you can't think of new feature is rather telling.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I have to go with Blowdart with this one:&nbsp; features first, technology second.<br>
<br>
Herbie<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/5f6514130a3d4e42940a9dec007d956f#5f6514130a3d4e42940a9dec007d956f</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/5f6514130a3d4e42940a9dec007d956f#5f6514130a3d4e42940a9dec007d956f</guid>
		<dc:creator>Herbie Smith</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dr Herbie/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><br>
this post made me think something i never thought before ..could it be that all the video arent embeded in flash because its not ms technology? ..its a bit off that C9 doesnt have an option to play the videos in flash ..only downloading them or streaming them
 to a stand alone player ..<br>
<br>
is this true or i am just running a conspiracy theory here?<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/c0588fa3038b4b089a549dec007d9599#c0588fa3038b4b089a549dec007d9599</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/c0588fa3038b4b089a549dec007d9599#c0588fa3038b4b089a549dec007d9599</guid>
		<dc:creator>mtz</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/mtz/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">mtz wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;<br>
this post made me think something i never thought before ..could it be that all the video arent embeded in flash because its not ms technology? ..its a bit off that C9 doesnt have an option to play the videos in flash ..only downloading them or streaming them
 to a stand alone player ..<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Why? What more does flash give you? Media Player for the Mac, and it's replacement suport mms streams. It's better quality, better bandwidth control. Why a conspiracy when franking streaming is a better option that downsizing and loosing quality like you see
 on YouTube<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/85d59b3cc01749b98bb99dec007d95c5#85d59b3cc01749b98bb99dec007d95c5</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/85d59b3cc01749b98bb99dec007d95c5#85d59b3cc01749b98bb99dec007d95c5</guid>
		<dc:creator>blowdart</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/blowdart/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">intrepid wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Yes - I know it doesn't support Linux, but there could be a 'simple site' for Linux&nbsp;users, or a &quot;Click here to download the video&quot; option for those that can't run Silverlight.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
So that's the new troll filter. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /><br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/f473e7f7f45145b087539dec007d95f2#f473e7f7f45145b087539dec007d95f2</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 09:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/f473e7f7f45145b087539dec007d95f2#f473e7f7f45145b087539dec007d95f2</guid>
		<dc:creator>GoddersUK</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/GoddersUK/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">blowdart wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>mtz wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;<br>
this post made me think something i never thought before ..could it be that all the video arent embeded in flash because its not ms technology? ..its a bit off that C9 doesnt have an option to play the videos in flash ..only downloading them or streaming them
 to a stand alone player ..<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Why? What more does flash give you? Media Player for the Mac, and it's replacement suport mms streams. It's better quality, better bandwidth control. Why a conspiracy when franking streaming is a better option that downsizing and loosing quality like you see
 on YouTube<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
one of the post above me said&nbsp; &quot;someone from the team said &quot;it is obvious&quot;. &quot; so if its obvious for silverlight will be used ...why not flash?<br>
<br>
i agree though, watching them on a stand alone player is much better than on a webpage because it will force me to always have a tab open for that page and i can continue to surf the web and watch the video at the same time ..<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/38a14b08623f4a789c069dec007d961f#38a14b08623f4a789c069dec007d961f</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 09:13:40 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/38a14b08623f4a789c069dec007d961f#38a14b08623f4a789c069dec007d961f</guid>
		<dc:creator>mtz</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/mtz/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">blowdart wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>mtz wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;<br>
this post made me think something i never thought before ..could it be that all the video arent embeded in flash because its not ms technology? ..its a bit off that C9 doesnt have an option to play the videos in flash ..only downloading them or streaming them
 to a stand alone player ..<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Why? What more does flash give you? Media Player for the Mac, and it's replacement suport mms streams. It's better quality, better bandwidth control. Why a conspiracy when franking streaming is a better option that downsizing and loosing quality like you see
 on YouTube<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Weren't you complaining that that we should have OGG support without downloading a new player?<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/5396ecb5f2a844dfa6f89dec007d964c#5396ecb5f2a844dfa6f89dec007d964c</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/5396ecb5f2a844dfa6f89dec007d964c#5396ecb5f2a844dfa6f89dec007d964c</guid>
		<dc:creator>Minh</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Minh/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Minh wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>blowdart wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>mtz wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;<br>
this post made me think something i never thought before ..could it be that all the video arent embeded in flash because its not ms technology? ..its a bit off that C9 doesnt have an option to play the videos in flash ..only downloading them or streaming them
 to a stand alone player ..<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Why? What more does flash give you? Media Player for the Mac, and it's replacement suport mms streams. It's better quality, better bandwidth control. Why a conspiracy when franking streaming is a better option that downsizing and loosing quality like you see
 on YouTube<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
Weren't you complaining that that we should have OGG support without downloading a new player?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Ogg has advantages. Flash for video delivery has major disadvantages <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/6c9b0b06a8c047c1afda9dec007d967a#6c9b0b06a8c047c1afda9dec007d967a</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:55:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/6c9b0b06a8c047c1afda9dec007d967a#6c9b0b06a8c047c1afda9dec007d967a</guid>
		<dc:creator>blowdart</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/blowdart/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Dr Herbie wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>blowdart wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>intrepid wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i><br>
I love channel 9, and would like to see the site spiffed up with a silverlight overhaul. It would make the whole site so much more engaging and allow for many new features (even if&nbsp;I can't think of one right now...).</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
How would bloat and pretty spinners make the site more engaging?<br>
<br>
And the fact that you can't think of new feature is rather telling.<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I have to go with Blowdart with this one:&nbsp; features first, technology second.<br>
<br>
Herbie<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I go with Herbie and Blowdart to.&nbsp; Features and Reliability.&nbsp; As a developer though, I know I can't come up with all the best idea's.&nbsp; They seem to come from discussions and using something.&nbsp; It would be nice if Channel 9 had a beta site (Maybe they do and
 I just wasn't invited - Another conspiricy theory:) that we could go kick the tires on.&nbsp; Say update it every month or so like CTP's, instead of just dropping the finished product:(</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/bad09b59e6914c9a9ff09dec007d96a9#bad09b59e6914c9a9ff09dec007d96a9</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/bad09b59e6914c9a9ff09dec007d96a9#bad09b59e6914c9a9ff09dec007d96a9</guid>
		<dc:creator>Boomport</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Boomport/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">blowdart wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;<br>
<br>
Ogg has advantages. Flash for video delivery has major disadvantages <img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Those poor disadvantaged guys at YouTube. They're disadvantaging all the way to the bank <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<br>
Re: streaming efficiency, most C9 videos works just as good as MP3.<br>
<br>
But here's my C9 video experience of FireFox. When I click on the mms: link, FF is confused and doesn't know how to handle that protocol. I even set up the protocol handler in FF -- not sure why it doesn't work.<br>
<br>
When I click on the http: link, FF offers to download it for me -- or to open up WMP once the download is complete. It's so nice.<br>
<br>
I see less hope for FLV on C9 though, with Silverlight streaming already here.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/b4eb180aa7b244508fa19dec007d96d5#b4eb180aa7b244508fa19dec007d96d5</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/b4eb180aa7b244508fa19dec007d96d5#b4eb180aa7b244508fa19dec007d96d5</guid>
		<dc:creator>Minh</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Minh/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Minh wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>blowdart wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;<br>
<br>
Ogg has advantages. Flash for video delivery has major disadvantages <img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"><br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
Those poor disadvantaged guys at YouTube. They're disadvantaging all the way to the bank
<img src="/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" border="0"></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I'm certainly not pushing Ogg here, but... Flash video *does* have disadvantages, most notably in terms of quality.<br>
<br>
YouTube chose Flash video as a least common denominator. Flash is ubiquitous, and, ultimately, cheaper in terms of bandwidth.&nbsp; In YouTube's case, they wanted to make their videos as easy to use/view as possible as cheaply as possible.
<br>
<br>
That doesn't mean Flash video is always the best choice. <br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/0d23a0305b76434b92ef9dec007d9702#0d23a0305b76434b92ef9dec007d9702</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/0d23a0305b76434b92ef9dec007d9702#0d23a0305b76434b92ef9dec007d9702</guid>
		<dc:creator>Randolpho</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Randolpho/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Randolpho wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;<br>
<br>
I'm certainly not pushing Ogg here, but... Flash video *does* have disadvantages, most notably in terms of quality.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I have to think that this is a cost control issue, not encoder quality issue. If YouTube is running up $1 million / month of bandwidth bill, then they would want the stream to be as short as possible.<br>
<br>
The FLV encoder must have a quality control meter just like every other video encoder out there.<br>
<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/41ab094ebd6844a8b7e99dec007d972d#41ab094ebd6844a8b7e99dec007d972d</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/41ab094ebd6844a8b7e99dec007d972d#41ab094ebd6844a8b7e99dec007d972d</guid>
		<dc:creator>Minh</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Minh/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">Minh wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table class="quoteTable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td class="txt3"><strong>Randolpho wrote:</strong>
<hr size="1">
<i>&#65279;<br>
<br>
I'm certainly not pushing Ogg here, but... Flash video *does* have disadvantages, most notably in terms of quality.<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
I have to think that this is a cost control issue, not encoder quality issue. If YouTube is running up $1 million / month of bandwidth bill, then they would want the stream to be as short as possible.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Agreed.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/c13f13d0a6ab42ac8c339dec007d97b3#c13f13d0a6ab42ac8c339dec007d97b3</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/c13f13d0a6ab42ac8c339dec007d97b3#c13f13d0a6ab42ac8c339dec007d97b3</guid>
		<dc:creator>Randolpho</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Randolpho/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question - Will Silverlight come to C9?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Re: Will Silverlight come to C9?</em><br>
<br>
Yes!&nbsp; The inline player will be replaced with a Silverlight player.&nbsp; This will allow us to drop encoding streaming mp4's (this is only on Channel 10 right now) so encoding for our videos will take less time.&nbsp; It will also give Firefox users a consistent experience
 with IE users.&nbsp; Same thing for other browsers Silverlight supports.<br>
<br>
<em>Re: What about Linux?</em><br>
<br>
Unfortunately, Linux will have the same experience it does today on our site.&nbsp; You must download the appropriate file to watch videos.&nbsp; However, we will have more formats available than we have today (like MP4).<br>
<br>
<em>Re: What about other features on C9 using Silverlight?</em><br>
<br>
We currently have no plans for other features on the site using Silverlight.&nbsp; We have a few ideas, but they have no priority right now.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/145da633dd464112830e9dec007d97df#145da633dd464112830e9dec007d97df</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 08:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/254904-Question-Will-Silverlight-come-to-C9/145da633dd464112830e9dec007d97df#145da633dd464112830e9dec007d97df</guid>
		<dc:creator>Erik Porter</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/HumanCompiler/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>