Well, that would certainly be a poke in the eye for the virtualisation vendors.
The Register has picked up on the latest Apple mystery making the rounds on the Internet, and concludes that it's a possibility.
I certainly don't see them pulling this off without Microsoft's help.
-
Follow
Oops, something didn't work.
Sign In to be begin to follow this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.Getting "follow" information
Start following this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.Removing your "follow"
Setting up your "follow"
Did you know you can
sign up for email notifications?
-
-
The Register wrote:More likely, though, is that this is a tweak made to help the likes of Parallels and VMWare more tightly integrate their Windows-on-Mac tools with the host operating system. Parallels in particular tries to allow Mac users to run Windows apps as if they were native applcations rather than apps running on Windows running in a Mac OS X window.
This scenario is about a billion times more likely. -
darklotus
Carpe Noctum
I just dont understand how Apple can make their OS only work for their machines (without intervantion) but they feel free to write things so they can use windows apps. It seems sorta one sided to me.
"No you cant use our OS but we can boot yours and use your apps as we wish." -
magicalclick
remember the flow
All you need is a Virtual PC to run Apple app, but then, you already can get it on windows. [A]
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.