Yup. The feature-list in Wife2.0 is substantially more complete than 1.0. Not to mention the new skin! Woooo (Wife 1.0 shipped with an American Skin. Wife 2.0 has a Brazilian-theme) Hehe.
This version supports internationalization and multi-lingual user-interfaces. It breaks less and works more than 1.0. It serves the user rather than forcing the user to serve it, like all good software should!
I feel sorry for the poor fella who got my 1.0 version. That thing was littered in bugs, and there was no recovery-disk either, which means no format/clean-install...
So I'm downloading the 2.0 update right now. At this rate, I'll have it finished installing and functioning in about 6 months. Only thing is, it has a proximity-sensor which requires it to be ran from Florida, so I'll have to relocate their to get full satisfactory
output from the application.
I've been using the Demo of 2.0 for a few months now. It doesn't come with all of the functionality...the great features are only available to owners of the license 
But I'm really enjoying its seemless-integration with my current configuration and environment.
It also works well with vista.
-
Follow
Oops, something didn't work.
Sign In to be begin to follow this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.Getting "follow" information
Start following this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.Removing your "follow"
Setting up your "follow"
Did you know you can
sign up for email notifications?
-
jsampsonPC
SampsonBlog.com SampsonVideos.com
-
littleguru
<3 Seattle
OMG! Get back to the real world! To much virtual is no good! believe me.
She is nice! AND she is a person not a thing - you make me feel as if you treat her like a thing! -
littleguru
<3 Seattle
jsampsonPC wrote:Guru, is a "Queen" a thing? If so, she's treated like a thing
A very important thing 
Nope, but "Queen" appears only in your first reply to me
I'm so happy for you that you found such a nice girl (again)! I hope for you both that it is working out this time! Man enjoy the time with her, she is worth it a million times!
btw. What's up? You have hair!!! -
jsampsonPC
SampsonBlog.com SampsonVideos.com
Guru, is a "Queen" a thing? If so, she's treated like a thing
A very important thing She probably received nearly a dozen massages this weekend, and visited nearly every attraction Chattanooga, TN has to offer - she treats me good, and I return the
favor. We work pretty well
Oh, and the public methods of Wife2.0 have fewer arguments
-
jsampsonPC
SampsonBlog.com SampsonVideos.com
Yup. I have hair now
I'm going for the W3bbo-style Still have a ways to go. First time having hair in nearly 10 years. -
littleguru
<3 Seattle
jsampsonPC wrote:Yup. I have hair now I'm going for the W3bbo-style
Still have a ways to go. First time having hair in nearly 10 years.
you look older now - without the hair and with the cap you looked really a lot younger -- when's the first baby due?
Btw. I can lend you my old hair - cut it down right before TechEd - muahaha! -
jsampsonPC
SampsonBlog.com SampsonVideos.com
littleguru wrote:
jsampsonPC wrote:
Yup. I have hair now I'm going for the W3bbo-style
Still have a ways to go. First time having hair in nearly 10 years.
you look older now... when's the first baby due?
Baby-production is one of the licensed-features As per our terms of agreement I will get that functionality when I stop using the Demo, and move into my production-environment with the full-version of the application I don't use full-featured demos...if
you know what I mean
-
littleguru
<3 Seattle
jsampsonPC wrote:Baby-production is one of the licensed-features As per our terms of agreement I will get that functionality when I stop using the Demo, and move into my production-environment with the
full-version of the application I don't use full-featured demos...if you know what I mean
Well there might be cracks around - haha! No, she is really nice - I also told you over IM that I like her Tell her best wishes from me!
-
jsampsonPC
SampsonBlog.com SampsonVideos.com
littleguru wrote:
jsampsonPC wrote:
Baby-production is one of the licensed-features As per our terms of agreement I will get that functionality when I stop using the Demo, and move into my production-environment with the full-version of the
application I don't use full-featured demos...if you know what I mean
Well there might be cracks around - haha!
Possibly. But I have an agreement with the Senior Developer of this application not to use certain features until the application is licensed It's in the Terms of Agreement
-
JohnnyAwesome
Eggshell with Romalian type. What do you think?
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
-
littleguru
<3 Seattle
jsampsonPC wrote:Possibly. But I have an agreement with the Senior Developer of this application not to use certain features until the application is licensed It's in the Terms of Agreement
Tell me that you signed an NDA that prohibits you to walk around technical limitations and doesn't allow you to reverse engineer to find a way to crack it
I hope she never reads this conversation
-
ZippyV
Fired Up
jsampsonPC wrote:I feel sorry for the poor fella who got my 1.0 version. That thing was littered in bugs, and there was no recovery-disk either, which means no format/clean-install...
There is only one way to fix that problem: do a complete disassembly. -
jason818_253.33
Yippi skippy
congratulations!
-
Lloyd_Humph
If Blackberrys are addictive cellphones, Channel9 is the ultimate addictive website.
ZippyV wrote:jsampsonPC wrote:
I feel sorry for the poor fella who got my 1.0 version. That thing was littered in bugs, and there was no recovery-disk either, which means no format/clean-install...
There is only one way to fix that problem: do a complete disassembly.
With a sharp object... whoa I'm in a stabby mood
-
jsampsonPC
SampsonBlog.com SampsonVideos.com
YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:
littleguru wrote:
She is nice! AND she is a person not a thing - you make me feel as if you treat her like a thing!
not a thing but an instance of a class
Wife newWife = New Wife.CreateFromGirlfriend(Jonathan.Girlfriend);
-
magicalclick
remember the flow
jsampsonPC wrote:YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:
littleguru wrote:
She is nice! AND she is a person not a thing - you make me feel as if you treat her like a thing!
not a thing but an instance of a class
Wife newWife = New Wife.CreateFromGirlfriend(Jonathan.Girlfriend);
I thought it should be WifeV2 newWife = New WifeV2.Create(Girlfriends.Jonathan);
It should have more features and bug fixes, not an instance of an outdated class. -
evildictaitor
I'll live forever, or die trying!
jsampsonPC wrote:
... when I stop using the Demo, and move into my production-environment with the full-version of the application.
Whoa! That instance-of-a-class looks pretty fully featured to me! JSampsonPC.Wife extends BeautifulObject all right! Congrats!
-
cheong
Recent Cheevo unlocked: You got cookied!
magicalclick wrote:
I thought it should be WifeV2 newWife = New WifeV2.Create(Girlfriends.Jonathan);
It should have more features and bug fixes, not an instance of an outdated class.
No need for a new class name if the class is in strong named assembly, and you correctly referenced the assembly in the config file.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.