Here is an idea: If you are a Microsoft developer/tester, just spend 1 hour somewhere in the next week checking/adding/updating the PInvoke signatures for code you own over on PInvoke.net.
-
Follow
Oops, something didn't work.
Sign In to be begin to follow this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.Getting "follow" information
Start following this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.Removing your "follow"
Setting up your "follow"
Did you know you can
sign up for email notifications?
-
Peter
Peter
-
I don't really understand why the PInvoke.net is missing the structs, enums and delegates already provided here:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=f1dd70e4-c212-4a6f-bff7-c82e34c8836f
When there is
static extern int SetDIBitsToDevice(IntPtr hdc, int XDest, int YDest, uint
dwWidth, uint dwHeight, int XSrc, int YSrc, uint uStartScan, uint cScanLines,
byte [] lpvBits, [In] ref BITMAPINFO lpbmi, uint fuColorUse);
The BITMAPINFO could be a hyperlink to the struct, but the struct could perhaps be also shown on the same page or something.
OTOH MS should incorporate some way to pull different variations of the PInvoke declarations and structs straight from the IDE.
And if I am reading some WIN32 functions help while being in a C# project for example, there could be a way to pull the C# declarations from Internet database directly in the MSDN help.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.