http://playboyarchive.com/
NOT SAFE FOR WORK!
-
maxzuck
Spaceman Spiff!
-
Harlequin
http://twitter.com/TrueHarlequin
Wouldn't mind a Channel 9 interview on this one. Since I'd like to know what techs they used for this. If it is Deep Zoom, I figured that was pretty much for images only, the Playboy site seems to have interactions in the pages, like menu clicks and stuff. Would like to know how they did that. And they can highlight text too, which tells me they Xaml'ed all the pages, not just scanned.
Edit: Not a fan of how the mouses scrollwheel makes the page go up and down, and not zoom in/out. -
Noticed a Microsoft Employee on twitter said "OMFGS this is work?" when he was surfing that for testing
-
Harlequin said:Wouldn't mind a Channel 9 interview on this one. Since I'd like to know what techs they used for this. If it is Deep Zoom, I figured that was pretty much for images only, the Playboy site seems to have interactions in the pages, like menu clicks and stuff. Would like to know how they did that. And they can highlight text too, which tells me they Xaml'ed all the pages, not just scanned.
Edit: Not a fan of how the mouses scrollwheel makes the page go up and down, and not zoom in/out.Deep Zoom
Giggles like a little boy.
Hehe sorry couldn't resist making this comment. -
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Beatiful. Simply beautiful. Err, the technology, of course.
Was that Jessica Rabbit? -
ZippyV
Fired Up
I expected less articles.
-
maxzuck
Spaceman Spiff!
Well then I guess next time someone says they ready Playboy for the articles... you just might believe that person.ZippyV said:I expected less articles.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.