Dexter said:
Bass said:
*snip*

Indeed, transactional databases require non cached writes (and it's not only about filesystem caching but also about hardware caching).

 

As for read caching: of course they cache reads, it would be insane not to do it. The filesystem has no magic orb to tell it what exactly to cache, read ahead, discard from cache etc.

It doesn't but an OS can accomplish a lot of the intelligent read caching by a paging algorithm, which keeps track of the most commonly read parts of a file. This is easy to implement with the information the kernel gets from mmap and subsequent use of the mmaped space. Most of the performence heavy lifting can be done by the kernel, which knows more about the characters of the persistent store (eg: location of the R/W head, etc).

 

It would be downright stupid for a DB to take all of this in it's own hands, but I am sure there is some legacy DBs out there who still do all of this, because they were written during a time where MS-DOS was considered advanced. Smiley