Charles said:
Bas said:
*snip*

Will this always be the case?

 

...

C

The reasoning of the article escapes me. The point you make about the suitability of the CLR for truly dynamic languages seems fair and applies equally well to the JVM. Still, even as a static typist, I don't hope this signals Microsoft's dying belief in dynamic languages. It can be dangerous to neglect a whole class of developers.