<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 Forums - Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:11:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>7</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>-7</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>-1</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lets say I want to run a new search engine. Behind the scenes it would need a bot/script gathering information from the web and storing this information in a local database to make searching faster (like google and bing probabbly do).</p><p>To run this bot will I need to pay 24/7 compute hours? Even if I only get one search query a day on my brand new sparkling search engine targetting my database repository?</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/ff471b4ae03b48e2aa009e59018437c8#ff471b4ae03b48e2aa009e59018437c8</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/ff471b4ae03b48e2aa009e59018437c8#ff471b4ae03b48e2aa009e59018437c8</guid>
		<dc:creator>CKurt</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/CKurt/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question#cff471b4ae03b48e2aa009e59018437c8">CKurt</a>: Unless you have a lot of money to burn, don't use Azure. There are cheaper alternatives.</p><p>Yes you can turn your worker role on and off whenever you want but are you always going to remember it?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/5364f515e57c42a7ab029e5a000bbaf3#5364f515e57c42a7ab029e5a000bbaf3</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/5364f515e57c42a7ab029e5a000bbaf3#5364f515e57c42a7ab029e5a000bbaf3</guid>
		<dc:creator>ZippyV</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/ZippyV/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My prediction: Azure will look like a 100% clone of AppEngine very soon. Very very soon. Meaning per page invocation, cron (task-scheduler) API, memcache API, a NoSQL database, and most important: no talk about instances, roles, routing, and the like. In other words PaaS not IaaS. I am aware that Microsoft is calling Azure PaaS and I don't understand why. But then my acquaintance with Azure is only superficial. Maybe someone can enlighten me.</p><p>I think Microsoft's error with Azure is that it's trying to take the single-server paradigm to the cloud. It might win the support of current-generation .net developers (and also PHP devs) who are used to managing servers, but Google's approach is more logical if you're making a site with a view towards scalability. you know, Google knows a few things about that <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/37113325b7534bc7bc9b9e5a00be2c7b#37113325b7534bc7bc9b9e5a00be2c7b</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:32:24 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/37113325b7534bc7bc9b9e5a00be2c7b#37113325b7534bc7bc9b9e5a00be2c7b</guid>
		<dc:creator>fanbaby</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/fanbaby/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question#c37113325b7534bc7bc9b9e5a00be2c7b">fanbaby</a>: I don't see any advantages of AppEngine.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/c145a84fed5c4eb2abdf9e5a00ca1711#c145a84fed5c4eb2abdf9e5a00ca1711</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:15:47 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/c145a84fed5c4eb2abdf9e5a00ca1711#c145a84fed5c4eb2abdf9e5a00ca1711</guid>
		<dc:creator>ZippyV</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/ZippyV/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question#c5364f515e57c42a7ab029e5a000bbaf3">ZippyV</a>: Okay, so my prediction was right, I would have to pay 24/7 compute hours! Thanks ZippyV !</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/8b9a9e0a58124d039aa89e5a00cbd55d#8b9a9e0a58124d039aa89e5a00cbd55d</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/8b9a9e0a58124d039aa89e5a00cbd55d#8b9a9e0a58124d039aa89e5a00cbd55d</guid>
		<dc:creator>CKurt</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/CKurt/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Azure and the other &quot;Cloud&quot; platforms i have seen are mostly todays new buzzword for sales.&nbsp; I have been looking at them and trying to see how a startup could win / make money using them and I have still not found a good case for it.</p><p>SAD</p><p>I like a lot of the *IDEAS* but the prices just do not add up as far as i can see. Most of what they do you can do with low cost web hosting, the only thing you lose is the redundant hardware that keeps you running if a node goes down.</p><p>but by the time you are paying for multiple hot nodes you can buy servers and manage them.</p><p>granted that costs but then so does Azure ....</p><p>they say it's cost effective but seems like only a CPA can show that with a bunch of numbers that the average guy will never understand.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/4558d51cd6274e959eeb9e5a00e34aac#4558d51cd6274e959eeb9e5a00e34aac</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/4558d51cd6274e959eeb9e5a00e34aac#4558d51cd6274e959eeb9e5a00e34aac</guid>
		<dc:creator>figuerres</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/figuerres/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Azure prizing question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question#c4558d51cd6274e959eeb9e5a00e34aac">figuerres</a>: True dat. </p><p>I WANTED so bad to recommend and use Azure but alas, I cannot <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-6.gif?v=c9' alt='Sad' /></p><p>For me it's a real head-scratcher. Any organization I can think of who might benefit would have to disregard a non-trivial investment in existing infrastructure. Sure an incremental/hybrid approach is viable but, again, how/why would you sell that? Perhaps the less-than-scrupulous technologist could make the sell. I dunno :-/</p><p>Anyone sold this? What am I missing?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/a498c8fde3c14b5b9bcc9e5b000618b9#a498c8fde3c14b5b9bcc9e5b000618b9</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Azure-prising-question/a498c8fde3c14b5b9bcc9e5b000618b9#a498c8fde3c14b5b9bcc9e5b000618b9</guid>
		<dc:creator>ScottWelker</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/ScottWelker/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>