<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 Forums - Coffeehouse - Is There an &#39;Abstraction&#39; Calculus?</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:45:24 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:45:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>4</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>-4</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>-1</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Is There an &#39;Abstraction&#39; Calculus?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is there any such formalization of the process of abstraction? You know, in the same way there is a formalization of lambda calculation via the lambda calculus?</p><p>If not, couldn't there be?</p><p>It's one thing to understand a program, another thing to abstract, another thing still to understand and reason about the process of abstracting during program development. If there were an 'abstraction' calculus, maybe it would be easier to teach engineers about abstraction as well as when and how to do it?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/9e682bb6db1d4e3286c49e42016a0e33#9e682bb6db1d4e3286c49e42016a0e33</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/9e682bb6db1d4e3286c49e42016a0e33#9e682bb6db1d4e3286c49e42016a0e33</guid>
		<dc:creator>bryanedds</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/bryanedds/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Is There an &#39;Abstraction&#39; Calculus?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Something like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_theory">category theory</a>?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/85472b69b4d54387b6609e4300246e8c#85472b69b4d54387b6609e4300246e8c</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/85472b69b4d54387b6609e4300246e8c#85472b69b4d54387b6609e4300246e8c</guid>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Ross</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Jsoh/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Is There an &#39;Abstraction&#39; Calculus?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I'm not sure. I've never delved into category theory. Suppose I finally will this evening <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/2c3c2e2ba02944b3b4ee9e4300359847#2c3c2e2ba02944b3b4ee9e4300359847</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 03:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/2c3c2e2ba02944b3b4ee9e4300359847#2c3c2e2ba02944b3b4ee9e4300359847</guid>
		<dc:creator>bryanedds</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/bryanedds/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Is There an &#39;Abstraction&#39; Calculus?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since improvement&nbsp;of an abstraction is known as refinement, I think you may be looking for &quot;Refinement Calculus&quot; which actually exists. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; I was surprised.&nbsp; <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refinement_calculus">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refinement_calculus</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/9aacc00c22b44c7a9a8d9e43017d0b2a#9aacc00c22b44c7a9a8d9e43017d0b2a</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Is-There-an-Abstraction-Calculus/9aacc00c22b44c7a9a8d9e43017d0b2a#9aacc00c22b44c7a9a8d9e43017d0b2a</guid>
		<dc:creator>Richard Anthony Hein</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Richard.Hein/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>