18 minutes ago, Maddus Mattus wrote
...as cheap and as good as could be, no...
...patent[s do] not add value to the end product.
... So the end product is not as good as can be...
The reason [drugs] are so expensive [is because of] legal battles big pharmaceuticals play out.
[patents are] the reason you cant have small time operators.
The costs [of patents] outweigh the risks.
I'm saying that [patents] makes the product more expensive then it should have been
[patents] prohibits competition
[patents do] not drive innovation.
