<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 Forums - Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/rss"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:00:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>6</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>-6</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>-1</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Maximum number of errors has been exceeded.&nbsp; We've all seen it (I'd presume) and we know why.&nbsp; Additionally we sympathise with the visual studio team as to how hard it is to balance performance in this situation.</p><p>So it is what it is.</p><p>I'm in a situation where I'm doing a major rework of a solution and I've been working through the code changes in compiler generated order for about 3 weeks now.&nbsp; It is hard on the brain knowing that significant progress is being made but having nothing tangible to gauge it by is _________.&nbsp; I'm not sure what the right descriptive word would be.&nbsp; &quot;Disheartening&quot; conveys the slumped shoulders ho hum keep going but carries with it a negative conotation, which isn't the case.</p><p>I haven't heard of a setting that will increase the maximum error limit.&nbsp; You know, one of those nobody should ever know about this reg entry and it is a use one off, one time, at your own risk type of thing.</p><p>Just being able to occasionally see the full error list so as to keep some&nbsp;weekly sanity would be nice.&nbsp; Anyone want to share their secret or alternative&nbsp;for sanity in such a situation?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/3d69e456d6e446329c5ea0cc00cf760d#3d69e456d6e446329c5ea0cc00cf760d</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/3d69e456d6e446329c5ea0cc00cf760d#3d69e456d6e446329c5ea0cc00cf760d</guid>
		<dc:creator>Dave Williamson</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/davewill/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives#c3d69e456d6e446329c5ea0cc00cf760d">davewill</a>: Is there any way you can break it up into smaller projects? Or is it not componentized like that?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/cdbe84d0c6074517ad43a0cc0105b2ef#cdbe84d0c6074517ad43a0cc0105b2ef</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:52:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/cdbe84d0c6074517ad43a0cc0105b2ef#cdbe84d0c6074517ad43a0cc0105b2ef</guid>
		<dc:creator>kettch</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/kettch/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives#ccdbe84d0c6074517ad43a0cc0105b2ef">kettch</a>: Unfortunately no.&nbsp; Part of the rework involves a lot of reorg as well.&nbsp; The reorg is in the reverse direction.&nbsp; The solution projects were too granular and now the overall solution is being simplified, name spacing reworked,&nbsp;and&nbsp;made into saas.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/c5dc1601168b4cb1bc6ba0cc010afe5a#c5dc1601168b4cb1bc6ba0cc010afe5a</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/c5dc1601168b4cb1bc6ba0cc010afe5a#c5dc1601168b4cb1bc6ba0cc010afe5a</guid>
		<dc:creator>Dave Williamson</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/davewill/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Woot!&nbsp; Friday &#43; finally no compile errors = great weekend</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/36d3a49a19134b079af5a0da0164055d#36d3a49a19134b079af5a0da0164055d</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/36d3a49a19134b079af5a0da0164055d#36d3a49a19134b079af5a0da0164055d</guid>
		<dc:creator>Dave Williamson</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/davewill/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The amount of time required to product a complete error/warning list for a large, broken C# solution is probably more than you'd like to spend waiting on a compile. &nbsp;The number isn't going to be accurate as the number of errors increase anyways, since you can easily end up in situations where hundreds of errors are caused by a single off-by-one typo; conversely, a single typo (say, an unclosed multi-line comment for a simple example) could hide many errors. &nbsp;Attempting to measure how long a solution will take to fix using this number is therefore useless.</p><p>But there is still a way to see what kind of mountain you have to climb -- use Resharper. Its&nbsp;Errors in Solution&quot; window can be of some help with getting past the compiler limit.&nbsp;</p><p>In general, Resharper is a very good tool when doing some brownfield recovery. &nbsp;The number of warnings you'll see in the Code Issues window will probably require a trip to a therapist, since it not only covers compiler warnings, but hundreds of different potential problems (redundant casting, parentheses, forgetting to specify culture in string.IndexOf(), forgetting semicolons at the end of Javascript statements**, etc.) but you can sort the problems by type and fix them across your solution all at once.</p><p>Resharper isn't the only game on the block, either -- JustCode and CodeRush are both very good tools as well and are priced similarly to Resharper.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>(** yes I know it's not strictly necessary for the code to run but some JS minifiers don't handle missing semicolons very well)</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/1332ade87a96465d992aa0dd005876d4#1332ade87a96465d992aa0dd005876d4</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:22:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/1332ade87a96465d992aa0dd005876d4#1332ade87a96465d992aa0dd005876d4</guid>
		<dc:creator>warren</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/warren/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Max errors in Visual Studio - alternatives</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives#c1332ade87a96465d992aa0dd005876d4">warren</a>: Thanks for sharing your insight.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/7b39aa5e61534c19b806a0dd00e1d3a3#7b39aa5e61534c19b806a0dd00e1d3a3</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Max-errors-in-Visual-Studio-alternatives/7b39aa5e61534c19b806a0dd00e1d3a3#7b39aa5e61534c19b806a0dd00e1d3a3</guid>
		<dc:creator>Dave Williamson</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/davewill/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>