I found this fun video on .NET vs Java.
I might disagree with the ideas made in the video, but it is quite funny....
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdwk35_dylin-prestly-microsoft-net-vs-java_tech
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
I found this fun video on .NET vs Java.
I might disagree with the ideas made in the video, but it is quite funny....
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdwk35_dylin-prestly-microsoft-net-vs-java_tech
I think it was posted a while ago ![]()
It's funny, makes me wonder if all java people are gay ![]()
LOL!
Funny indeed. Creative. I like the ending...
C
That video is both funny and tells the truth about microsofts forced lockin plans
For example have anyone noticed that we don't get to choose between silverlight, flash and html5 on many microsoft sites ? we are forced to install craplight..erm..i mean silverlight to watch videos.
At least adobe fixes flash bugs eventually, microsofts plainly refuses to fix bugs and follow rules (ex the good citizen rule)
OMG, LMFAO at 2:42!
My dream girl, lol. ![]()
6 hours ago,Mr Crash wrote
For example have anyone noticed that we don't get to choose between silverlight, flash and html5 on many microsoft sites ? we are forced to install craplight..erm..i mean silverlight to watch videos.
Apple forces you to use quicktime. Adobe forces you to use flash on their site. Youtube, hulu, vimeo, etc force you to use flash.
Your point?
(ms also uses flash on their sites btw)
You're also not "forced" to do anything. If you find your only choice is through one platform, it's because the other platforms "forced" your hand, not because the one platform that you inevitably chose "forced" you to choose it. Now, if you were "forced" from above to adopt a certain platform, then it is that higher agent that "forced" you into using that platform.
Choices don't "force" you to choose them, external sources do.
Did you notice the old Windows sound that was played when the child says he uses Java? Also, did you notice the Bill Gates picture on the wall in the dinning room next to the father?
1 day ago,Klaus Enevoldsen wrote
Did you notice the old Windows sound that was played when the child says he uses Java? Also, did you notice the Bill Gates picture on the wall in the dinning room next to the father?
also when dad sets down the book the cloth on the nightstand has 4 stripes in the windows / ms colors.... yeah the thing is *LOADED* with small bits of MS colors / logos / sounds etc...
There is also this video:
@MasterPie: Actually both Youtube and vimeo have html5 support although it's not 100% working yet
> Apple forces you to use quicktime.
Apple will always be apple, they suck and they know it but got their head up their * so refuse to acknowledge it, anyway there exists open source implementations for quicktime (ah reverse engineers thank you!!) so no problem there
hulu, well lets just say, their kissing some * so they can get the rights to the content, one way they do that is to use flash which the rights holders think is secure, lol.
btw flash open source implementation is in progress. adobe's locked in business model will fail
> (ms also uses flash on their sites btw)
erm where ? or are you thinking of the ads (which might not be from microsoft, duh!) ?
> You're also not "forced" to do anything. If you find your only choice is through one platform, it's because the other platforms "forced" your hand, not because the one platform that you inevitably chose "forced" you to choose it. Now, if you were "forced" from above to adopt a certain platform, then it is that higher agent that "forced" you into using that platform.
> Choices don't "force" you to choose them, external sources do.
Your "logic" is flawed.
Having only one option is not a choice.
> it's because the other platforms "forced" your hand
No, it's because microsoft like adobe thinks it can lock in users (ex not providing information so an alternative/open source/competitive version can be created)
competition is good, monopoly is bad, yes it is that simple (not always but most of the time)
Good example: Ever heard of the browser wars ?
I really like this one, old but still funny:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY
the only thing i liked about surface was the screen size and touch, everything else was horrible
ex the touch response/latency time, ew vista slow
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.