Hoping that this fulfils just some of it's promise:-
-
Follow
Oops, something didn't work.
Sign In to be begin to follow this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.Getting "follow" information
Start following this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.Removing your "follow"
Setting up your "follow"
Did you know you can
sign up for email notifications?
-
Ian2
In geeks we trust ...
-
Harlequin
http://twitter.com/TrueHarlequin
Next step unfortunately is a large automotive or oil company buys the patents, and you never see this again....
-
PopeDai
I moustache you a question, but I'm shaving it for later.
"updated 4/6/2011 5:29:19 PM ET"
I saw this video in 2012 - the article says they hoped to get something into production by the end of the year. Where is it now?
-
Ian2
In geeks we trust ...
Oops + YouTube Video Uploaded on 29 Oct 2009
Ho Hum.
-
Proton2
Gary G Mount
That article underestimates the efficiency of the conventional combustion engine.
-
Proton2
Gary G Mount
This engine design was a featured article at Watts Up With That, two years ago:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/11/new-gasoline-engine-design-has-4x-efficiency-of-pistons/
UPDATE: Ian, I just noticed, that article is 2 years old. That's quite a shock wave. /sarc
-
Bass
I need better writers.
If your theoretical engine design doesn't basically cure cancer it won't get DARPA funding.
-
Harlequin
http://twitter.com/TrueHarlequin
This looks exactly like a DARPA-fundable project...if they can build vehicles that go 200-300% farther on a tank of gas. This is something I can see having a military-first application. Even if it start with something simple like generators.
Add your 2¢