I've changed the damn title of the thread, what's wrong now? Is this a manner school?
Itchy censor fingers lately, huh?
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
I've changed the damn title of the thread, what's wrong now? Is this a manner school?
Itchy censor fingers lately, huh?
You troll, you get locked. Simple as that.
3 minutes ago, PaoloM wrote
You troll, you get locked. Simple as that.
Aha
But whatever, let's continue the topic. What's your take on IE 10 for Win7?
What take on what?
Well, do you think IE 10 for 7 is dodo-ized?
I like cake.

I think if you don't have anything nice to say, perhaps you shouldn't say anything at all.
It is entirely possible to express what you are saying without needing to resort to vile or hateful language.
If you want to talk about IE10, please do so. But you don't need to phrase it as abuse. Doing so is against the T&Cs of C9.
C9 is not obliged to put up with abusive posts. If you post abusive or clearly bad-faith threads, you should expect your threads to get locked, your posts to be deleted and your account to get banned.
Mmmm...cake...

@kettch: the cake is a lie.
@Blue Ink:the cake is not a lie
SkyDrive.com doesn't work with IE10 anyway. So, it is actually a good news.
3 minutes ago, magicalclick wrote
SkyDrive.com doesn't work with IE10 anyway. So, it is actually a good news.
The problem is, there's no news. The article says that IE10 is only available on Windows 8, which accurately reflects the state of the art. Any inference on its availability on Windows 7 later on is just speculation. Which is legitimate, of course, just not news.
20 minutes ago, Blue Ink wrote
*snip*
The problem is, there's no news. The article says that IE10 is only available on Windows 8, which accurately reflects the state of the art. Any inference on its availability on Windows 7 later on is just speculation. Which is legitimate, of course, just not news.
IE10 will only be on Windows8. It is too heavilly tied to the Windows8 security and UI model to be trivially back-ported to Windows7, and that won't happen under Sinofsky's watch. His management style is to put all available resources into making the next version of Windows more marketable rather than giving out freebies to existing Windows customers.
It's kind of evil, but from a business perspective you can see why they're doing it.
it facinates me how Microsoft continuously trying to make web a platform-dependent community. And yet, it cannot be done when web is never owned by anyone, especially the FF/Chrome era..
50 minutes ago, evildictait​or wrote
*snip*
IE10 will only be on Windows8. It is too heavilly tied to the Windows8 security and UI model to be trivially back-ported to Windows7, and that won't happen under Sinofsky's watch.
FWIW - Brendon Lynch - discussing IE10 Do-Not-Track, about a week(ish) ago.
"Windows 7 customers using IE10 will receive prominent notice that DNT is turned on in their new browser, together with a link providing more information about the setting,"
Add your 2¢