Just wondering, which managers / developers constitute the ASP.NET MVC team? Phil Haack used to be the "public face" of the MVC team (and technically a PM?), who works on this technology now?
-
Follow
Oops, something didn't work.
Sign In to be begin to follow this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.Getting "follow" information
Start following this thread
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.Removing your "follow"
Setting up your "follow"
Did you know you can
sign up for email notifications?
-
-
davewill
here birdie birdie, get in my belly!
Scott Hanselman is one. Ha. A remote worker was listed first.
-
I don't think ScottHa is on the MVC team (or has even been). The new PM, according to Scott's reply on Twitter, is Daniel Roth.
-
davewill
here birdie birdie, get in my belly!
-
blowdart
Peek-a-boo
Yes, just saw that one twitter
-
HumanCompiler
Now with more program management
-
HumanCompiler
Now with more program management
P.S. THIS is me on Channel 9: http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/HumanCompiler
I used to work on the Channel 9 dev team.
-
@HumanCompiler: Congrats on the new position! BTW, are you a human that compiles or do you compile humans?
-
HumanCompiler
Now with more program management
@cbae:That is a good question. Why can't I be both?
-
Well, ASP.NET MVC is a really good example of what is going wrong at Microsoft. Some youngsters trying to act the Java world instead of focusing on Microsoft strength. I wouldn't have any problems with ASP.NET MVC as a replacment for Webforms if it would provide the abtraction level of ASP.NET Webforms or technologies that uses XAML.
ASP.NET MVC is simply garbage, because it doesn't provide what it want to be. You don't have any separation between ui and logic. You even don't have a separation between markup and code. Instead you have to mix code with markup to bind data to the view and to make the view dynamic.
ASP.NET MVC makes it impossible to let the designer create the gui and let the coder implement the logic. It even can't assure that you separate your business logic and data access logic into separate layers. Someone who didn't use pattern with ASP.NET Webforms will likely don't use them with ASP.NET MVC. Instead those people are putting all its garbage into the model.
Instead of building and optimizing Webforms, there is virtually no real change in the ASP.NET world. There is a new framework, but it can't do virtually nothing better than webforms and mostly lacks abstraction and development speed.
-
vesuvius
Count Orlock
@xxxcoderxxx: Ignore this post, it is a troll
-
MVC 4 Beta has been released, and it has ASP.NET Web API (formerly WCF Web API) built in.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.