Channel 9 Forums - Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.png Channel 9 Forums - Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them. http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums en Wed, 22 May 2013 09:36:36 GMT Wed, 22 May 2013 09:36:36 GMT Rev9 5 -5 -1 Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series Hey Charles, what happened to part three of E2E: Brian Beckman and Erik Meijer - Co/Contravariance in Physics and Programming?

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/533558#533558 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:43:43 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/533558#533558 Joshua Ross 5 http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Jsoh/Discussions/RSS Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series Furthermore, what happened to all the deeply technical programs? I don't want to see Ping. I don't want to see VS 2010 promos disguised as tutorial screencasts. Please concentrate on Going Deep. That's what made C9 credible. Over the past year or so C9 has become exactly what critics claimed back in the day: another MS marketting tool.

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/7b4a4051880f45f980059dea00fbfc8a#7b4a4051880f45f980059dea00fbfc8a Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:53:37 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/7b4a4051880f45f980059dea00fbfc8a#7b4a4051880f45f980059dea00fbfc8a eyeris 5 http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/eyeris/Discussions/RSS Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series Maybe they finally found out they got chain rule wrong.. I was actually amazed nobody pointed that out in the comments.. seems most viewers watched it for the show...

 

∂(f ° g)(t)=∂f(g(t)) ° ∂g(t) should be written as ∂(f °g)(t)=∂f(g(t)) * ∂g(t).. where ° is composition operator and * multiplication...

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/9ddda386287d4c8a9da19dea00fbfcb6#9ddda386287d4c8a9da19dea00fbfcb6 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:36:08 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/9ddda386287d4c8a9da19dea00fbfcb6#9ddda386287d4c8a9da19dea00fbfcb6 RoyalSchrubber 5 http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/RoyalSchrubber/Discussions/RSS Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series
RoyalSchrubber said:

Maybe they finally found out they got chain rule wrong.. I was actually amazed nobody pointed that out in the comments.. seems most viewers watched it for the show...

 

∂(f ° g)(t)=∂f(g(t)) ° ∂g(t) should be written as ∂(f °g)(t)=∂f(g(t)) * ∂g(t).. where ° is composition operator and * multiplication...

Maybe the third show will be errata show!  When they were writing it out did they say times or composed with?

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/fc9964d07c564c268a959dea00fbfce2#fc9964d07c564c268a959dea00fbfce2 Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:00:52 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/fc9964d07c564c268a959dea00fbfce2#fc9964d07c564c268a959dea00fbfce2 Joshua Ross 5 http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Jsoh/Discussions/RSS Site Feedback - Part three of the Beckman and Meijer Series
JoshRoss said:
RoyalSchrubber said:
*snip*

Maybe the third show will be errata show!  When they were writing it out did they say times or composed with?

Erik and Brian have been very busy... I just interviewed Brian (it's a human piece, not technical, but Brian is awesome and his stories are wonderful - so, I think you'll like it) and we talk about when part 3 will happen.

 

Sorry for the delay.

 

In terms of the comments on C9 losing cred, I'm not sure I can agree. Yes, we have added more types of content, but I have been making technical stuff at the rate I always have. Further, we have other teams making technical content as well (see all the Rx videos, for example or the great work by the RiSE team (Peli is becoming quite the content creator) and the list goes on - Cloud Cover, Hanselman's pieces, Silverlight TV, etc). That said, I will make more GDs after MIX10. I have two E2Es in the pipeline (one on JavaScript research and another with the great Leslie Lamport). There is also a new Lecture series in the works, Advanced Concepts in Functional Programming with Haskell (we will have a guest lecturer for this series and you will be quite pleased with who it is...).

 

Please continue to provide feedback about what you want more of. As always, if some content is not of interest to you, then you don't have to watch/listen/read it. Lots of people who are enjoying Ping, for example, probably don't watch Going Deep. That's fine. We are trying to expand what we deliver to suit the wants and needs of a diverse set of viewers. GD will not go away or be replaced by lighter fare. New deeply technical series will emerge (for example, stay tuned for my new series, Algorithm 9 (not sure what I'll call it, but love putting 9 next to words Smiley) and other deep tech content).

 

Keep on posting,

C

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/3abacd26dff54270b8569dea00fbfd14#3abacd26dff54270b8569dea00fbfd14 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:08:43 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Feedback/533558-Part-three-of-the-Beckman-and-Meijer-Series/3abacd26dff54270b8569dea00fbfd14#3abacd26dff54270b8569dea00fbfd14 Charles 5 http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Charles/Discussions/RSS