spivonious said:Mr Crash said:*snip*They all do the same thing but with minor syntax differences (+0, pointer vs. reference). I'm not sure what you're looking for here. I'd expect their performance to be identical.
> I'm not sure what you're looking for here.
Are anyone better over the others ? More c++ "correct"
> They all do the same thing but with minor syntax difference
yes but that minor syntax difference might make one of them better, more useful perhaps but since i'm not a c++ expert i ask in this forum thinking that there should be at least one in here that can answer this question.
#define _countof(_Array) (sizeof(*__countof_helper(_Array)) + 0)
Why use the "+ 0", any special reason for it ?
Is it a compiler hint of some sort ?
