@sysrpl /ignore <- see easy
1 hour ago, AdamSpeight2008 wrote
Since LINQ is a library of functions (incase of .net utilising IEnumerable and IEnumerator).
Right, linq for .net utilizes what already existed in .net. Your point?
How is different to learn a new library? @c_str
C and C++ is full of libraries developers have the potental to learn.
Do you mean difficult? It really depends on the library.
For example the multiple libraries for C++ that support LINQ that are compliment with the STL.
From a maintainability standpoint, the last two example @syspri provides are much simpler.
Really?
auto complete is going to work?
Effectively throwing away most of a language is going to help improve maintainability?
