http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/apogeum/Entries, comments and threads posted by Apogeumhttp://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/apogeum/en-usThu, 03 Jul 2008 13:18:34 GMTThu, 03 Jul 2008 13:18:34 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)Since it has always been my understanding that C9 is short for "9 brilliant videos by Charles a day", I am kind of bummed by the lack of Charles around here! I don't mind that Bill has departed, he basically left after Windows 95. <br><br>BUT, I want my Charles back! <br>(don't tell me he is still sick!)<br><p>in reply to <a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/413511-Oh-Charles-where-art-thou/'>Oh Charles, where art thou?</a></p><img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/413511/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" />http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/413511-Oh-Charles-where-art-thou/http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/413511-Oh-Charles-where-art-thou/Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:18:34 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/413511-Oh-Charles-where-art-thou/544http://channel9.msdn.com/413511/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Since it has always been my understanding that C9 is short for "9 brilliant videos by Charles a day", I am kind of bummed by the lack of Charles around here! I don't mind that Bill has departed, he basically left after Windows 95. BUT, I want my Charles back! (don't tell me he is still sick!)in&#8230;Apogeum16http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/413511-Oh-Charles-where-art-thou/RSS/http://channel9.msdn.com/413511/Trackback.aspxI am experiencing major performance issues wthin my web application. And I am concerned about my coding practices.<BR><BR>Counter: Processortime spikes up to 60% wihin one request. In production it reaches up to 80 or 90%.<BR><BR><BR>Concern 1: I am using very long ENUMs&nbsp;(one has over 300 entries)<BR><BR>Concern 2: I am storing rather big structs within hashtables (again several hundred entries in one hashtable)<BR>&nbsp;<BR>Concern 3: I am using StringBuilder A LOT!<BR><BR>Concern 4: I am collecting the output of the entire page and transforming it with one big xsl document<BR><BR><BR>Please let me know what you think!<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><p>in reply to <a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/404914-ASPnet-Coding-Practices-vs-Performance/'>ASP.net Coding Practices vs Performance</a></p><img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/404914/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" />http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/404914-ASPnet-Coding-Practices-vs-Performance/http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/404914-ASPnet-Coding-Practices-vs-Performance/Thu, 22 May 2008 13:19:26 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/404914-ASPnet-Coding-Practices-vs-Performance/1297http://channel9.msdn.com/404914/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I am experiencing major performance issues wthin my web application. And I am concerned about my coding practices.<BR><BR>Counter: Processortime spikes up to 60% wihin one request. In production it reaches up to 80 or 90%.<BR><BR><BR>Concern 1: I am using very long ENUMs&nbsp;(one has over 300 entries)<BR><BR>Concern 2: I am storing rather big structs within hashtables (again several hundred entries in one hashtable)<BR>&nbsp;<BR>Concern 3: I am using StringBuilder A LOT!<BR><BR>Concern 4: I am collecting the output of the entire page and transforming it with one big xsl document<BR><BR><BR>Please let me know what you think!<BR><BR><BR><BR>Apogeum15http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/404914-ASPnet-Coding-Practices-vs-Performance/RSS/http://channel9.msdn.com/404914/Trackback.aspx