<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for Bebo</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/bebo/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by Bebo</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/bebo/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:11:32 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:11:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Utility for web server statistics [Utility for web server statistics]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Anyone have a recommendation for&amp;nbsp;a good/free&amp;nbsp;log analyzer for IIS? I'd like one that generates reports that I can then publish on the webserver itself.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'm currently using &lt;a href="http://awstats.sourceforge.net/"&gt;http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and like it, but I was just wondering if anybody knew of anything else that worked well.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/28031-Utility-for-web-server-statistics/'&gt;Utility for web server statistics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/28031/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/28031-Utility-for-web-server-statistics/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/28031-Utility-for-web-server-statistics/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:11:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/28031-Utility-for-web-server-statistics/</guid><evnet:views>9202</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/28031/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;Anyone have a recommendation for&amp;nbsp;a good/free&amp;nbsp;log analyzer for IIS? I'd like one that generates reports that I can then publish on the webserver itself.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'm currently using &lt;a href="http://awstats.sourceforge.net/"&gt;http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and like it, but I was just wondering if anybody knew of anything else that worked well.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bebo</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/28031-Utility-for-web-server-statistics/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/28031/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>CruiseControl.NET vs Draco.NET [CruiseControl.NET vs Draco.NET]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I think &lt;a href="http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html"&gt;continuous integration&lt;/a&gt; is an excellent idea.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'd like to know your thoughts/opintions/experiences with &lt;a href="http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Welcome%2Bto%2BCruiseControl.NET"&gt;CruiseControl.NET&lt;/a&gt; and/or &lt;a href="http://draconet.sourceforge.net/"&gt;Draco.NET&lt;/a&gt;. Which one do you prefer? Which one works better?j&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I found this &lt;a href="http://www.theserverside.net/articles/showarticle.tss?id=ContinuousIntegration"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; that was really helpful. Any additional comments?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;~Bebo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/17205-CruiseControlNET-vs-DracoNET/'&gt;CruiseControl.NET vs Draco.NET&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/17205/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/17205-CruiseControlNET-vs-DracoNET/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/17205-CruiseControlNET-vs-DracoNET/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/17205-CruiseControlNET-vs-DracoNET/</guid><evnet:views>9301</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/17205/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;I think &lt;a href="http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html"&gt;continuous integration&lt;/a&gt; is an excellent idea.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'd like to know your thoughts/opintions/experiences with &lt;a href="http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Welcome%2Bto%2BCruiseControl.NET"&gt;CruiseControl.NET&lt;/a&gt; and/or &lt;a href="http://draconet.sourceforge.net/"&gt;Draco.NET&lt;/a&gt;. Which one do you prefer? Which one works better?j&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I found this &lt;a href="http://www.theserverside.net/articles/showarticle.tss?id=ContinuousIntegration"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; that was really helpful. Any additional comments?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;~Bebo&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bebo</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/17205-CruiseControlNET-vs-DracoNET/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/17205/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft Development Environment Sounds [Microsoft Development Environment Sounds]</title><description>Does anybody use the "Microsoft Development Environment Sounds" in your "Sounds and Audio Devices Properties"? It has options for Breakpoint Hit, Build Canceled, Build Failed, and Build Succeeded.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Just wondering...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;~Bebo&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15398-Microsoft-Development-Environment-Sounds/'&gt;Microsoft Development Environment Sounds&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/15398/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15398-Microsoft-Development-Environment-Sounds/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15398-Microsoft-Development-Environment-Sounds/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:33:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15398-Microsoft-Development-Environment-Sounds/</guid><evnet:views>8652</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/15398/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Does anybody use the "Microsoft Development Environment Sounds" in your "Sounds and Audio Devices Properties"? It has options for Breakpoint Hit, Build Canceled, Build Failed, and Build Succeeded.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Just wondering...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;~Bebo</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bebo</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15398-Microsoft-Development-Environment-Sounds/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/15398/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Wiki vs SharePoint [Wiki vs SharePoint]</title><description>I am really into wiki. I have installed a wiki for our developers at work with great success. Nothing is easier and faster to propogate information and ideas.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The company I work for wants to start using a SharePoint site. It thinks that this will be the cure for information sharing. I am skeptical, but I don't have any experience with SharePoint so I don't really know. It looks like it has a ton of cool features, but how practical is it?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So, if you had to put SharePoint head to head with a good Wiki implementation, who would win?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'd like to hear your thoughts and experiences. Thanks!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;~Bebo&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14291-Wiki-vs-SharePoint/'&gt;Wiki vs SharePoint&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/14291/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14291-Wiki-vs-SharePoint/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14291-Wiki-vs-SharePoint/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:43:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14291-Wiki-vs-SharePoint/</guid><evnet:views>75726</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/14291/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I am really into wiki. I have installed a wiki for our developers at work with great success. Nothing is easier and faster to propogate information and ideas.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The company I work for wants to start using a SharePoint site. It thinks that this will be the cure for information sharing. I am skeptical, but I don't have any experience with SharePoint so I don't really know. It looks like it has a ton of cool features, but how practical is it?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So, if you had to put SharePoint head to head with a good Wiki implementation, who would win?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'd like to hear your thoughts and experiences. Thanks!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;~Bebo&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bebo</dc:creator><slash:comments>30</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14291-Wiki-vs-SharePoint/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/14291/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>